January 5th, 2013

Montana Shooting Sports Association: Open Letter: No New Gun Laws

Editor’s note: I found an email this evening which is an open letter, and will share it below. It was written by Gary Marbut of Montana Shooting Sports Association (MSSA). MSSA, a private political organization with strong support in the Montana legislature and an association which has introduced and seen passed into Montana law more than fifty pieces of legislation, is Montana’s pro-active Second Amendment lobby. MSSA wrote the “Made in Montana” Firearms Freedom Act of 2009, a landmark challenge to current Federal interpretation of the commerce clause. Oath Keepers reminds readers that “out-of-Staters” may also join Montana Shooting Sports Association, and we recommend doing so. Like JPFO and GOA, MSSA works hard and effectively to preserve the Republic as founded. The letter below is an example.


Elias Alias


Gary Marbut, MSSA

Gary Marbut, MSSA


Dear MSSA Friends,

You will be interested in the letter I just sent to Montana’s congressional delegation on behalf of MSSA.  You are invited to contact the offices of these members of Congress to say that you agree with the MSSA position.

Gary Marbut, president
Montana Shooting Sports Association


Montana Shooting Sports Association, Inc.
P.O. Box 4924
Missoula, Montana 59806

January 5, 2013

Dear Senators Baucus and Tester, and Congressman Daines,

Greetings from Montana.

Because there is much discussion among gun owners of Montana about proposals by Senator Feinstein and others for Congress to enact various types of gun control, I though you would appreciate knowing what I hear from Montanans about this.  I speak to you as a person intimately familiar with firearms, with public policy about firearms, as a person accepted in state and federal courts as an expert on firearms, firearms safety, and use of force, and as the president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, Montana’s primary organization asserting the right to keep and bear arms, also affiliated or associated with the National Rifle Association, Gun Owners of America, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and the Second Amendment Foundation.

On behalf of the Montana Shooting Sports Association I wish to express our unequivocal opposition to any ban on any class or type of firearms, any new registration requirements on any class or types of firearms, any restrictions on manufacture, sale, or possession, of ammunition feeding devices of any configuration or capacity, and any government intrusion into firearm transfers between private citizens.  Any congressional actions in any of these areas would be an infringement upon the rights the citizens of Montana have reserved to themselves.

The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article II, Section 12 of the Montana Constitution. These sections of these foundational documents are not government permission to keep firearms.  They are statements whereby the people have reserved these rights to themselves specifically from government interference.  These statements do not create any rights, but simply recognize preexisting “natural rights” which are restricted from government interference.  As you consider whatever “gun control” (actually, people control) may be offered by Senator Feinstein or others, I hope you will keep these facts clearly in mind.

“Gun free zones” are a terrible failure of public policy. Virtually all mass shootings, including the one in Connecticut that has sparked the current wave of media hysteria, happen in places where public policy has incorrectly assured people that they are safe, but where the policy has actually created risk-free zones for madmen, and pools of defenseless victims conveniently offered up for slaughter by failed policy.  Former police officer Ron Avery says, “The only way to check violence in progress, where the victim can neither hide nor flee, is by equal or greater force in a timely manner.“  If Congress feels compelled to “do something” in the wake of the Connecticut shooting, it should repeal the pretense of all federally-mandated or federally-inspired “gun free zones.”
For any inside the Beltway who actually believe in the effectiveness of “gun free zones,” I recommend that the White House, the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House, the U.S. Supreme Court and all federal courthouses be declared “gun free zones” and that all armed guards and protective personnel in those places be removed.  If “gun free zones” are effective for our kids, they’re good enough for our servants.

Various gun bans, licensing or registration schemes, and/or bans or restrictions of ammunition feeding devices will fail. I won’t bother you with discussion of the fact that any such restrictions will have no effect on criminals or madmen.  I believe you already know that.  I do hope to inform you about how strongly the gun owners of Montana feel about their right to keep and bear arms.  I have asked around among a considerable number of friends, acquaintances and contacts in Montana.  I have not learned of anyone who would comply, for example, with a new federal law requiring them to register or surrender their semi-auto rifles to authorities.  Let me be very clear:  Montanans will not comply with any new federal restrictions.  The most any such restrictions would do would be to create a huge, new, armed, outlaw class of citizens.  And, I very much doubt that most Montana law enforcement personnel would cooperate in enforcing any such federal restrictions.

Clearly, the vast numbers of citizens who have bought new firearms in the past month, especially the hundreds of thousands of expensive semi-auto rifles, did not buy these new firearms simply so they’d have them available to surrender if Congress should pass a law demanding they do so.

Conclusion. Since Montana law enforcement personnel are unlikely to enforce any such restrictions, the effect of passage of such restrictions would ultimately be for federal officers to come to Montana to enforce them.  Because most Montanans will simply not comply with any new federal restraints on a right they have reserved specifically from government interference, the obvious result would be armed conflict between Montanans and federal enforcers.  (I offer this not as a threat or a challenge, but simply as an observation.)

I certainly hope you would not set Montana on the path to an armed conflict with federal enforcers by aiding or supporting passage of any new federal restrictions.  That would not be in the best interest of your constituents.

Instead, if you feel compelled to pass some actually corrective legislation in response to the media hysteria over the Connecticut shooting, I highly recommend that you get rid of those dangerous and illusory “gun free zones.”

Very sincerely,

Gary Marbut, President
Montana Shooting Sports Association


Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath

Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!

 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

7 Responses to “Montana Shooting Sports Association: Open Letter: No New Gun Laws”

  1. 1
    Ed Warden Says:

    They have it right, I believe that most if not all Americans who own firearms ( SAFETY TOOLS) will not peaceably turn them over to this corrupt govt. These federal law enforcement are AMERICANS and should say NO WE WILL NOT COMPLY. AMERICANS MURDERING AMERICANS, this is what the OBAMA administration and many in congress and should i say many in our state and local govts also want. This we must not let happen.

  2. 2
    Rick Anderson Says:

    I fully agree with Mr. Marbut’s letter and statements and will support his, and the MSSA, in any way I can. As an Oath Keeper, I have already stated my intent not to comply with any anti-Constitutional laws or regulations passed by any government body, either federal or state level. The government must be forced to face the fact they have no authority to violate our God given right to keep and bear arms, as documented by our founders in the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution. Molon Labe.

  3. 3
    Jon Says:

    Great letter.. I hope that we continue to see these. I’ve heard all of the same sentiments in my one on one talks with family and friends all in Law Enforcement and Armed Services. Keep up the challenge!

    Thanks to the Oath Keepers

  4. 4
    Milt S. Chandler Says:

    Hear, here.

  5. 5
    Aaron Says:

    I Refuse to submit, and will not turn in any guns, I will not register, I will not submit to a bunch of new Federal laws. If they ban any guns I feel it will be my duty to fulfill my oath to defend the constitution, as the second amendment says shall not be infringed, it does not say a little infringement is okay it says “NO” infringement!

  6. 6
    Randy Says:

    Any politician who votes for or acts in any way to support violations of the Bill of Rights or the U.S. Constitution has committed Treason. He or She should be immediately arrested and jailed…using whatever force is necessary to effect that arrest.
    No Compromise.
    It is just that simple folks. Lets see what happens next.

  7. 7
    Joseph P. Martino Says:

    When gun control was imposed in Canada, a pro-gun organization gave this list of “don’ts” to its members.

    December 4th, 1998 It appears some bright sparks have taken to writing “NEVER” across the firearms registration forms and sending them to (a politician). They didn’t even need a stamp! (The politician) has them in a great big box in the middle of his office and is going to give them to Justice Minister (named) as a Christmas gift.
    Ho Ho Ho. Another practical joke being played by these very humorous folks is to take a whole stack of registration forms and register guns to their neighbors and other folks picked randomly out of a phone book. Sometimes these silly people even forget to include the money. They think it’s really funny to have all those people at the CFC phoning fictitious gun owners up to collect ten dollars on a gun that doesn’t exist. They think it’s really funny to have the costs of C-68 escalate through the roof!
    Sometimes they even send the money. One of these jesters (I think his name was Simon) told me that he registered ten individual guns to ten non gun owners. AND HE INCLUDED THE MONEY. This zany guy said half the people that received registration cards would complain to the RCMP and they would spend A LOT OF MONEY trying to remove them from their great big “BRAINIAC” computer. But the really funny part was that half the people would simply throw the registration away like junk mail (since they didn’t own a gun) and leave half the guns (and owners) in the system.
    The knee slapper here is that these people and guns don’t even exist. Now don’t misunderstand. CILA would NEVER recommend these delinquents do such a thing. These baaad Canadians are trying to damage the Canadian Government’s registration system. Even though measures like these will GRIND THE SYSTEM TO ITS KNEES in short order CILA thinks you should go “baa, baa” and blindly obey the rules.
    Even though the Government of Canada has declared war on you, you should still obey.
    Let me add a few more funny jokes you should never do. Do NOT send in a registration card for the spouse/child of one of the Members of Parliament that started this bill. Do NOT send in registration cards for various people in various parts of the country for a fictitious gun with the SAME serial number. Do NOT send in registration cards for media types that promoted this bill listing various illegal items.
    There are many ways of figuratively putting sand in the gears. The Resistance should encourage its members to think of as many ways as possible, and carry them out. Creativity helps.”

    You can find more helpful informatioin in my book RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. (shameless plug) Get it from Amazon.

Leave a Reply

© 2012 www.oathkeepers.org | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148