December 20th, 2012

Clarification Letter by Paragould, Arkansas Police Department


Below is the clarification letter from the Paragould, Arkansas Police Department, as published on December 16, 2012.

Please see our initial article (and read the comments!) here -
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2012/12/16/papers-please-mayor-declares-martial-law-in-paragould-ak/

-

Paragould_logo

-

https://pandaunite.org/ParagouldPDClarifyingpressrelease.htm

-

12/16/2012

“Armed Patrol” Clarifications Recently, an article was written by the Paragould Daily Press regarding our Street Crimes Unit.  Following the article’s appearance, several questions and concerns have arisen from our citizens regarding the tactics and methods in which the unit would be operating under.  At this time, we want to clarify the questions and concerns that are currently circulating in the community.

First, let’s look at the purpose of the Street Crimes Unit.  The purpose of this unit is to increase police presence in high crime rate areas of the city.  These areas are identified by examining reports generated from calls for service, and also from citizens who call the Police Department or City Hall with safety concerns in their neighborhoods.  Once an area has been identified as a high crime neighborhood, the select group of officers will saturate the area in an attempt to curb the criminal behavior that is plaguing that particular neighborhood.  Officers will accomplish this in a variety of different methods.  Officers will be working to identify residents in the affected area so that we can better serve our affected neighborhoods.  Most often, this identification process will be nothing more than making contact with a subject, handing them a business card, and asking if they live in the area and if there’s anything we can do for them.  During hours in which crime seems to be more prevalent (i.e. between the hours of 11pm and 5 am), our process will become more stringent.  We will be asking for picture identification.  We will be ascertaining where the subject lives and what they are doing in the area.  We will be keeping a record of those we contact.  The record keeping is two-fold:  First, we want to try to keep from over-lapping making contact with the same people multiple times.  Once we know where people live, or that they always walk in that particular neighborhood, then we’ll not need to repeat that contact.  We will not be harassing citizens.  Secondly, by documenting those of the criminal element, we have a record of that contact and where/when it occurred.  An example of where this will be helpful is if a crime (i.e. burglary, breaking or entering) is reported the next morning.  We then have a list of “go-to” suspects to question regarding that incident or incidents.

Another issue that seems to be of concern is the mention of Street Crimes Unit officers carrying AR-15 rifles with them during these patrols.  To give a little background information, several of our patrol officers already carry AR-15 rifles in their patrol vehicles.  The AR-15 and police work is nothing new.  Our Street Crimes Unit will not be wearing them constantly. That would be impractical.  As we have stated in our meetings, our main purpose of mentioning this was to prepare our residents in the event that they saw an officer armed with one.  When our officers deploy into areas where there is the potential for contacting several subjects in a high-crime area, that is when the potential deployment of AR-15’s will occur.

Many citizens, through various media outlets, have expressed a concern about the police “violating rights” or “violating the Constitution”.  We have to abide by the same rules, regulations, and laws that our citizens do.  We are not out to violate anyone’s rights.  Once we have an area that shows a high crime rate or a high call volume, it is our duty and obligation to find out why this is occurring and what we can do to prevent the trend from continuing.  Therefore, identifying subjects in those problem areas help us to solve crimes, and hopefully to prevent future crimes.

In closing, the purpose of the Town Hall meetings is to inform you, the citizen, of a potential solution to combat the increase of crimes, both property related and violent.  Understand, crime is fluid and ever-changing.  We as law enforcement are forced to change with it.  We are making an effort to educate our citizens via the Town Hall meetings about crime statistics in each area of town, crime prevention tips, and the Street Crimes Unit.  At each meeting, we welcome questions and/or suggestions.  Unfortunately, only 100 residents have taken advantage of the two opportunities we have given thus far.  Our hope is for you to attend one of the remaining two meetings this week to hear our plans and so that we may get your input.  The meeting this Tuesday, December 18th, will be held at Center Hill Church of Christ at 7p.m.  The meeting on Thursday, December 20th, will be at the Paragould Community Center at 7 p.m.

-end-




SUPPORT OUR BILLBOARD CAMPAIGN
Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath


Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!



 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

5 Responses to “Clarification Letter by Paragould, Arkansas Police Department”

  1. 1
    Cal Says:

    My two-cents worth:

    That is so very Nazi of you, Paragould, Arkansas Police Department.

    Let me clarify something for you. When you say that “During hours in which crime seems to be more prevalent (i.e. between the hours of 11pm and 5 am), our process will become more stringent. We will be asking for picture identification. We will be ascertaining where the subject lives and what they are doing in the area. We will be keeping a record of those we contact”; that unless a crime is being committed, your LEGAL job is to patrol, be visible, and be there to deter crime with your presence. Talk to the people, not ask them what they are doing there as if they are already criminals. Interaction is good, Demanding why they are there is not good or lawful. Checking ID’s, picture Id’s, writing reports – all excuses to overstep your legal bounds.

    When you start taking ID’s, and making records of those out you are stepping out of your legal duties under our legitimate government. It is not the people that YOU work for to inform you of what they are doing if they are abiding by the law like they are under martial law. (Or is this another “practice run” for Obama to see if the people will put up with it?) Sure, like warrantless searches, tracking, spying, etc (and pre signed or unsigned warrants) it makes YOUR job easier; but it still is NOT legal here in the USA.

    I would be fighting for your resignation and the firing of any who assisted you in coming up with this “concept” of curbing crime and securing the “safety” of the people. Not that the basis for it would be hard to find: Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Bush, Obama, etc are great examples of that type of policing.

    “We as law enforcement are forced to change with it”. Very Obama and communistic, nazi of you. YOUR job is to work within Constitutional restraints for individual liberty. Just like there is NEVER an excuse for the Patriot Act, NDAA, TSA, DHS illegal actions here in the USA; nor is there a real excuse for your new suggestions to curb crime.

    If you have already had increased and visible officers there, then maybe for a time you need to hire more, have a denser coverage, walking in pairs. The more they patrol the same area, the more they will get to know the “regulars” there. Some advise, change the timing of patrols by a few miutes daily so that the criminal element cannot time around them.

    The excuse to overstep your legal bounds not viable. You are jsut following the same corrupt bs that Obama, and Bush, are using /used – that it is for OUR safety. You have a good excuse to request more funding, put on more officers – maybe part-time for the increased crime hours?

  2. 2
    Cal Says:

    Yes, I sent it to them. I am an equal opportunity person, I make everyone angry. /big grin

  3. 3
    Patriot Says:

    How about the day the Chief institutes this, we google and spokeo search the names and addresses of EVERY officer in the department, and publish or at least “keep a record” of them…
    It’s very easy to do.

  4. 4
    jim3888 Says:

    is not following your oath flat out treason? why should there be any attempt to fire or recall these nazis? these are exactly the people our Constitution is talking about.

  5. 5
    RPErvin Says:

    The Paragould Police Chief is backing out of this, or at least trying to, gracefully, after he and the Mayor so screwed up. Check this out: http://paragouldpolice.org/press_view.php?id=83

    I keep an eye on this because I ride through there now and then, on the way to the mountains.

Leave a Reply

© 2012 www.oathkeepers.org | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148