November 6th, 2012

BenghaziGate: Good God Almighty! Did Obama And CIA Arm Terrorists Who Murdered Our Ambassador?


Tortured Death by Jihadists

Tortured Death by Jihadists


BenghaziGate is a story which is growing legs despite every effort by the CIA, the White House and the U.S. State Department to cover it up. Just as the CIA failed to provide President Kennedy with plausible deniability in the Bay of Pigs fiasco/scandal, and just as CIA could not provide plausible deniability for President Reagan in the Iran-Contra scandal, my bet says CIA is not going to be able to provide President Obama with plausible deniability in the explosive gushing onslaught of revelations now pouring out of the Benghazi attacks of 9/11_2012.

Hark back to last year’s dynamic revelations of the U.S. Department of Justice three-prong assault on our nation’s values and our Republic’s laws: Remember “Fast and Furious”, the ATF’s idiotic scheme to arm the Mexican drug cartels so ATF could find out who the bad guys are? And do we all remember the subsequent revelations which followed on the heels of that crime spree by ATF – Wachovia Bank being fined one hundred sixty million dollars for laundering hundreds of billions of dollars worth of Mexican cartel drug money? – and finally the exposure of the DEA’s habit of helping the Mexican drug cartels actually import drug money into this country so they could find out who the bad guys are? That’s right: Drug cartels were getting guns from the ATF’s Operation Fast and Furious, while American banks were happy to launder profits for those Mexican drug cartels, and just to make sure the crime wave ran full speed with maximum effect, the damned DEA got caught actually helping the Mexican cartels get the dope across the border!

Remember all that? It was all being run by Eric Holder’s Justice Department. But when compared to BenghaziGate, it was child’s play.

Two gentlemen exposed Fast and Furious fiasco. Those gentlemen are Mike Vanderboegh of Sipsey Street Irregulars (home of the Three Per Cent patriot movement) and David Codrea, investigative journalist for Gun Rights Examiner. They worked tirelessly to convince Sharyl Attkisson of CBS that the story should be taken to the American public. Once CBS got it and ran the story, the cat was out of the bag.

And that is what is happening right now in the wake of the murder of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya by Islamic Jihadist terrorists. Like David Codrea and Mike Vanderboegh, Glenn Beck is ringing the Liberty Bell, forcefully and loudly, to expose something bigger than Fast and Furious, bigger than Watergate, even bigger than Iran-Contra. It is called:  “BenghaziGate!“. As Glenn Beck notes, this one is big enough to take down a sitting U.S. President.

Glenn Beck is asking if the Obama administration furnished the arms which attacked Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. Beck is also asking if Ambassador Stevens was coordinating the arms trade between Libyan Jihadists, operatives in Turkey, and al Qaeda and related Jihadist terrorist groups in Syria.

It’s election day, 2012. I lament that most American voters who will go to the polls today are clueless about this embryonic story as it struggles to achieve its birth into the public mindset. Regardless, this story will continue to grow – not just legs, but indeed will grow wings on which it can fly across America and around the world. Oath Keepers salutes Glenn Beck for taking the lead in revealing these questions. We also are grateful to those patriots within our Intelligence community who have helped Glenn Beck connect the dots.





Elias Alias

Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath

Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!

 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

28 Responses to “BenghaziGate: Good God Almighty! Did Obama And CIA Arm Terrorists Who Murdered Our Ambassador?”

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

  1. 1
    Orion Says:

    Of course, look back at all the pics/clips and see the oprs (boots on the ground) helping(?) with logistics(?) along side aL Qaeda. Pay attention not to the moving hand its drawing your focus to it while the other hand does the deed. But in the defense of the intel houses/operators they do follow chain of command.

  2. 2
    Austrian Economics is Color Blind Says:

    He certainly isn’t MY ambassador to Libya.

    As Ron Paul notes, this was blowback for our foreign intervention:

    Ron Paul’s Texas Straight Talk 9/17/12: Consequences of an Interventionist Foreign Policy

    Everyone knows that our government’s poking around in Libya wasn’t Constitutional! This is like what happened in the Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979:

    Is Ron Paul serious? Blowback in 1979 from a 1953 coup?

    As for Fast and Furious, that certainly wasn’t an “idiotic scheme” to “find out where the bad guys are”.

    No, that was a deliberate attempt to create a crisis that would increase the public’s support of further disarmament of Americans in violation of the Second Amendment, which recognizes the right of the sovereign citizens of the several states to kill their respective elected officials who violate their oath to the Constitution.

    Here is a good timeline of the Fast and Furious scandal to date:

    The Gunwalker Scandal: Overview and Timeline

  3. 3
    Kenny Moore Says:

    Rush military caller says that Obama ordered no response to Benghazi attack

    I wonder if it is possible to find out this “Oathkeeper” who called Rush Limbaugh.

  4. 4
    Elias Alias Says:

    Regarding following “chain of command”, we are confronted with the question of blindly following orders which should be evaluated to determine if said orders chance to be unlawful/un-Constitutional orders – because – soldiers who follow unlawful orders are subject to punishments under the UCMJ.

    Hence, “Oath Keepers”, with our list of “10 Orders We Shall Not Obey”. We should always be on the side of the Constitution as we fulfill our obligations to our chain of command – and the moral obligation to the Oath we swore.

    All that aside, I sometimes query myself – how would a CIA contractor feel, later in his life, looking back, in knowing that he had carried out an order to provide al Qaeda with Stinger missiles? All of us should think about situations such as that. If Glenn Beck is barking up the right tree, the Obama administration armed the Libyan rebels (remember: some of those rebels were al Qaeda) to wage war against the government of Libya last year, which all news channels reported was done. That would mean that the terrorists who attacked Ambassador Stevens may have been using weapons provided to them by the Obama administration last year.

    George Washington was right. And since the 1947 National Security Act which created the CIA, we have, as an unaware public, been duped by clandestine services at CIA while CIA has been on a rampage of non-stop criminality which has destroyed America’s good name around the world. Thankfully, a few good employees of CIA, with conscience, have come forward – Ray McGovern, Victor Marchetti, John Stockwell, and now Clare Lopez – to advise the American people about how CIA has been interfering with the autonomous destiny of many foreign nations, causing the world to hate our guts. The CIA operates on the premise that “the end justifies the means”. The problem with operating on such a flimsy premise is called “blowback”, which CIA seems to attract all too often. For the CIA to figure that “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”, in the case of providing Jihadist terror groups (including al Qaeda) with armaments, was and is insanity. Now a sitting U.S. President is faced with yet another CIA screw-up, about which CIA is incapable of providing the plausible deniability the President expects.

    Elias Alias

  5. 5
    Bob Fanning Says:

    Mike Bracken Navy Seal (ret) on PJ Media calls out Obama over his exclusive CBA cross border authority. Amber Lyon of CNN tells us that the media is paid to publish & censor.

    Glad that Oathkeepers is on the case.

  6. 6
    Stephen Says:

    Austrian economics you are spot on! I agree with everything you just mentioned. As soon as I read the part of “it was not an idiotic scheme to find out where the bad guys are”…i knew you would mention it was to further the attack on the 2nd A.

    i always thought that as well. benghazi incident was blowback..if not a false flag, but i won’t go there. our duopoly is taking us down, and the 100+ million sheeple that voted to keep the oligarchy in power are the problem.

    Libertarians will take this country back. we have been trying peacefully, but the violence that is coming to take our country back is inevitable. LIVE FREE

  7. 7
    Levin4Pres Says:

    I feel the burden of the blame is placed on the main stream media and the “dumbing down of America”. Had the MSM done their job, more people would know what happened. Fox was the only one brazen enough to report it. The rest of the “journalists” and MSM stations should be fired for media malpractice for the blackout on the matter. Whatever happened to the oath for the MSM, I believe from Missouri..? They make me sick to my stomach, these disgraceful vermin should be embarrassed and ashamed. I also thought it was nice how CBS supressed parts of Obamas interview which proved he was lying about him knowing that it was a terrorist attack. But I’m not surprised, this is the world we live in.

  8. 8
    Tony Says:

    This has been moved even further along than this story. I will paste the link below. The Obama administration has been trying to “oust” Assad for about 20 months. Remember all the comments they have made, “Hillary – Assads got to go”; “Obama – WMD’s is my red line”. But Assad has been much harder to remove than they thought (Probably because Iran and Russia is behind him). The Obama administration came up with a brilliant idea that if the world thought Assad used poisonous gas (mustard gas) against his on people, then there would be international support (UN, NATO, etc) to go in hard and get Assad. So they came up with a false flag plan to smuggle Khadaffi’s WMD’s from Libya into Turkey and then into Syria for use as a false flag. The reason all this fell apart is that Russia got wind of all this via satellite images and had the Turkish ambassador to meet with Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi to make the USA stop there plan. Obviously, the Obama administration decline, Stevens had to tell the Turkish ambassador that, the Turkish ambassador walked out of the CIA safe house in Benghazi, reported his findings and then the “GO” order to attack the safe house was given. Question, why has no one questioned the Iranians that were picked up in Turkey trying to make there way back to Iran? Iran was in charge of this attack! Here’s the article to back all this up:

  9. 9
    Matt Says:

    I believe this countrys gov is out of control and after serving for 14 years i am ashamed to admit it

  10. 10
    Bradford Says:

    I’m not saying this ia “true”, or not, simply because I don’t know… Glen Beck is getting to be the new Alex Jones. Mis-information, dis-information, propaganda, and lies…I’m sorry to see Oathkeepers getting into the gutter journalism business…Almost NOTHING GB says can be independently verified, or confirmed… Maybe “Benghazigate” is 100% TRUE… With all the arms available on the Global Market, it seems a stretch, that U.S. would NEED to arm Libyan rebels, or be so clumsy as to get caught at it so easily…maybe my nose is too sensitive, but this story just doesn’t pass the “smell test” for me…Another “false flag” seems a better explanation…just sayin’…

Pages: [1] 2 3 » Show All

Leave a Reply

© 2012 | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148