May 2nd, 2012

The New World Order: Paranoia Or Reality?




The New World Order: Paranoia Or Reality?

Wednesday, 02 May 2012

By Brandon Smith


The phrase “New World Order” is so loaded with explosive assumptions and perceptions that its very usage has become a kind of journalistic landmine.  Many analysts (some in the mainstream) have attempted to write about and discuss this very real sociopolitical ideology in a plain and exploratory manner, using a fair hand and supporting data, only to be attacked, ridiculed, or completely ignored before they get a chance to put forward their work.  The reason is quite simple; much of the general public has been mentally inoculated against the very whisper of the terminology.  That is to say, they have been conditioned to exhibit a negative reaction to such discussion instinctively without even knowing why.

Some of this conditioning is accomplished through the stereotyping of New World Order researchers as “conspiracy theorists” (another term for loony) grasping at fantasies in a desperate bid for “attention”, or, as confused individuals who attempt to apply creative logic to a mad chaotic world swirling on the periphery of a great void of coincidence and chance.  I know this because I used to be one amongst the naive herd of “rationalists”, and I and many I knew used the same shallow arguments to dismiss every cold hard fact on the NWO that we happened upon.  After seeing the conspiracy crowd made iconic and ridiculous in hundreds if not thousands of books, movies, TV shows, commercials, and news specials, it becomes difficult for many to enter into the topic without a severe bias already implanted in their heads.

Another circumstance that leads to the immediate dismissal of NWO research is, ironically, the lack of open discussion on the subject.  Yes, it’s a chicken and egg sort of thing.  If more people were less afraid to shine a floodlight on the truth of the matter, more people, in turn, would be more willing to absorb it.  And, if more unaware people were willing to listen to the information with an open mind, more people with knowledge would be willing to share it.  The psychological barrier to the information, therefore, is not based on any legitimate argument against the existence of the NWO.  Instead, people refuse to listen because they fear to embrace concepts personally that they believe are not yet embraced by the majority.

It is a sad fact of society that most men and women gravitate towards the life of the follower, and not of the leader.  Only through great hardship and trauma do some plant their feet solidly in the Earth, and find the strength to break free from the collectivist mindset.

Elitist think-tanks and propaganda machines like the Southern Poverty Law Center take full advantage of the hive mentality by attacking Liberty Movement proponents and NWO researchers in light of the populace’s lack of background knowledge.  A perfect example of this was the SPLC’s latest hit-piece on an Oath Keepers article dealing with the exposure of a Department of Defense program designed to import and train Russian soldiers on U.S. soil.  Because the article dares to mention the “NWO”, the SPLC jumps to the vapid conclusion that Oath Keepers are “paranoid”:

The poorly written diatribe is little more than an Ad Hominem stab by an ankle biting author, but I felt it did hold a certain value as a test case of the strategic exploitation of uneducated mass opinion.  Without the ignorance of a sizable portion of the American public, yellow journalism like the kind peddled by the SPLC would be relegated to the great dustbin of history…

If a man is able to get past his negative preconceptions on the matter, the next step is to ask a relatively straightforward question; what is the New World Order?  What is the foundation of the philosophy that drives it?  What are its origins?  This is something mainstream pundits never explore.  They simply take for granted that we in the Liberty Movement somehow made the whole thing up for our own entertainment.  In reality, the phrase New World Order made its public debut early in the 20th Century, and it was expounded by numerous political and business elites decades before there was such a thing as “conspiracy theorists”.

The Liberty Movement has always defined the NWO as a concerted effort by elitist organizations using political manipulation, economic subversion, and even war, to centralize global power into the hands of an unelected and unaccountable governing body.  The goal; to one day completely dismantle individual, state, and national sovereignty.  However, what I and many others hold as fact on the New World Order is not enough.  We must examine the original source and how we came to our mutual conclusions.

I have in numerous articles outlined the irrefutable data surrounding the directed efforts of corporate globalization and the deliberate strategies of central banks in the co-option of financial control over nations.  But, to solidify our understanding of what the most financially and politically powerful men on Earth and their cheerleaders believe the NWO is, why not go straight to the horse’s mouth:

“It is the system of nationalist individualism that has to go….We are living in the end of the sovereign states….In the great struggle to evoke a Westernized World Socialism, contemporary governments may vanish….Countless people…will hate the new world order….and will die protesting against it.” H.G. Wells, in his book, “The New World Order”, 1940

“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
- David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
- Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, Time Magazine, July 20th, 1992

“There does exist, and has existed for a generation, an international anglophile network which operates, to some extent, in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the communists, or any other group, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments … I have objected both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies … but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known … The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) … the American Branch of a society which originated in England … believes national boundaries should be obliterated and [a] one-world rule established.”

Prof. Carroll Quigley, mentor to Bill Clinton, from his book ‘Tragedy and Hope

“Ultimately, our objective is to welcome the Soviet Union back into the world order. Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations.”

President George Bush at Texas A&M University 1989

“We will succeed in the Gulf. And when we do, the world community will have sent an enduring warning to any dictator or despot, present or future, who contemplates outlaw aggression. The world can therefore seize this opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order – where brutality will go unrewarded, and aggression will meet collective resistance.”
President George Bush State of the Union Address 1991

“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.”
Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in The New York Times (April 1994)

“To keep global resource use within prudent limits while the poor raise their living standards, affluent societies need to consume less.  Population, consumption, technology, development, and the environment are linked in complex relationships that bear closely on human welfare in the global neighborhood. Their effective and equitable management calls for a systemic, long-term, global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development, which has been the central lesson from the mounting ecological dangers of recent times. Its universal application is a priority among the tasks of global governance.”
United Nations Our Global Neighborhood 1995

“What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system…a first step toward a new world order.”
Henry Kissinger on NAFTA, Los Angeles Times

“All these new challenges are bringing together about the biggest restructuring we’ve ever seen not just of the global economy but global order as a whole. And two hundred years ago, a famous British foreign secretary said that the new world had been called into existence to address the balance of the old. In 1989 another world war ended dominated by the cold war and people talked then in 1990 of the new world order. What they meant then was a new political order. And what was not foreseen then but is obvious now, from everything that we see and do, what we experience every day of our life is the sheer scale and speed and scope of globalization…”

Prime Minister Gordon Brown, CBI Speech 2007

“The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.”

CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April 1974 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs

As we can see quite clearly from the direct quotes above, the New World Order, and its pursuit of global government, is not some “delusion” built upon exaggerated claims or impractical fears.  It is, in fact, a very OPEN and freely admitted sociopolitical ideology held by a select and decidedly influential group of people.  To label it “conspiracy theory” is absurd.

Are capitalist and socialist organizations “conspiracy theory”?  Are political parties “conspiracy theories”?  Is Greenpeace a paranoid figment of our imagination?  What about corporate lobbyists?  Was the purge of Stalinist Russia a fable?  Did the Nazi party not actually seek to rule the world?  Obviously, these have all been substantial forces in the making of our current era.

Throughout history, very real organizations of people with specific and directed beliefs have sought to guide the course of our cultural progression according to their personal values, sometimes using coordinated and underhanded means.  The New World Order is no different in this regard.  Its uniqueness lay only in the insidious nature of its methods and the complexity of its structure.  In fact, I would have to question the sanity of anyone who DOESN’T believe that conspiracies are a constant and concrete reality.  Secretive groups of men have always sought power over others and have always cloaked their thirst in the auspices of patriotism and rationalism.

Another issue which average Americans stumble over is the fraudulent notion of the left/right paradigm.  For those within the ranks of the New World Order, “left” and “right”, Democrat and Republican, are ultimately meaningless terms.  This is undeniable after one realizes that the leadership on both sides of the aisle exhibit almost identical policy initiatives and voting records.  When the two primary political entities of a system differ only in rhetoric but not in action, one has to question whether they are separate parties at all:

When a liberty minded network like Oath Keepers points out the underlying New World Order-ness of a DoD program to train Russian soldiers on U.S. soil, they are referring to the centralizing nature of the procedure, and they are quite correct.  The problem is that those without any context or background knowledge are completely unequipped to understand the significance of the danger.  If only they knew about programs like the Security and Prosperity Partnership agreement between Canada, the U.S., and Mexico, constructed to dissolve sovereign military and economic functions between the three countries:

What is to stop this trend of military homogenization with neighboring foreign countries from spreading around the world, enabling corrupt governments stocked with proponents of globalism to use not only a country’s own troops domestically, but the troops of other nations?

As the SPLC points out in an attempt to be clever; this intermingling has been going on for quite some time.  What they fail to mention is the terrible track record these operations have amassed.  The ‘School Of The Americas’, for example, used the same rhetoric of “international cooperation” and the spreading of “democracy” as a fair trade when training foreign troops on U.S. soil, yet, all the school seemed to produce were tyrannical despots and mass murderers:,8599,2097124,00.html

Or, how about the recent training of the Iranian dissident group Mujahideen-e-Khalq (MEK) at a secretive Department of Energy site in Nevada:

Are we supposed to believe that the training of Russian troops within our border will produce better results?

These activities on the part of our government, in the end, do not serve the best interests of the American people in the slightest, but what they do serve, is the ideological addictions of the global elite.  That is to say, they further the interests of the New World Order.

As researchers and web journalists, we are supposed to be afraid to mention the NWO.  We are supposed to refrain from using certain vocabulary exactly because portions of the public are unfamiliar with it.  To be honest, I have to laugh at this dynamic.  I think it far better to embrace the truth of a matter, along with its dialogue.  To be unashamed and unabashed in the exposition of the facts regardless of the ignorance of those around us.  The New World Order is a definable and quantifiable political movement.  Elitists who praise it in public are showered with accolades while citizens who oppose it in public are accused of paranoid ramblings.  The less we care about what others might think, the more dedicated we can be to the truth.  At bottom, when it comes to matters of survival and principle, it is a far better thing to be “crazy” and right, than “sane” and wrong.

You can contact Brandon Smith

Alt-Market is an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for mutual aid and defense.  Join today and learn what it means to step away from the system and build something better.

To contribute to the growth of the Safe Haven Project, and to help us help others in relocating, or to support the creation of barter networks across the country, visit our donate page here:

Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath

Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!

 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

9 Responses to “The New World Order: Paranoia Or Reality?”

  1. 1
    Billy Moschella, Jr. Says:

    As an Oath Keeper, I must say that this is far and away the best article that I have yet read that puts it all into perspective in a clear and concise way. I have finally found something that I can share with friends and family to help them to better understand the truth behind the current nature of global affairs. There is, of course, much, much more to all of this, but this article is a tremendous starting point. As a side note: I encourage everyone reading this to try and dig a little deeper in regards to the impending joint military training procedures between U.S. and Russian troops in Colorado on May 21-24, as well as this week’s joint NORAD/NORTHCOM Operations happening in six U.S. states. I have reason to believe that these operations may in fact not have nefarious intentions. I hope that I am right. Research the Keenan Federal Lawsuit. According to documentation, liens have been placed against all twelve of the Federal Reserve Banks, as well as against the central banks of the G7 countries. There just may be another side to all of this, one with positive intentions. I find it hard to believe that all high ranking members of the U.S. military, or even a majority thereof, would simply go along with all of this mayhem. I believe that there are strong forces of good in the world, the Oath Keepers being one of those. We must keep up the good fight!

  2. 2
    Cal Says:

    Thank you for laying it all out so well!

    Some “fantasy” speeches from Obama show that facts mean nothing; lies, as long as they are what people want to hear, are acceptable. Obama’s May 1st speech:

    Obama – “It was here, in Afghanistan, where Osama bin Laden established a safe haven for his terrorist organization”
    The truth – Osama was recruited by the CIA, Al Qaeda was set up by with the support of the CIA. His safe haven was protected by US intelligence.

    Obama – It was here, in Afghanistan, where al Qaeda brought new recruits, trained them, and plotted acts of terror.
    Actually the Mujahideen were recruited and trained by the CIA. America’s ally Saudi Arabia financed the Wahabbi coranic schools, Ronald Reagan praised the Mujahideen as “Freedom Fighters”. Unknown to the American public, the US spread the teachings of the Islamic jihad in textbooks “Made in America”, developed at the University of Nebraska.

    Obama – “It was here, from within these borders, that al Qaeda launched the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 innocent men, women and children”. (Obama is referring to the 9/11 attacks.)

    The truth – To this date there is NO evidence that Al Qaeda was involved, just accusations and hearsay. Plus (CBS News reported) on September 10, 2001 Osama bin Laden had been admitted to a Pakistani military hospital in Rawalpindi courtesy of America’s ally Pakistan. How did he coordinate the 9/11 attacks from his hospital bed, if that was truly where he was?

    Obama – “… And so, 10 years ago, the United States and our allies went to war to make sure that al Qaeda could never again use this country to launch attacks against us.
    [The 9/11 attacks was the justification for waging war on Afghanistan on the grounds of` "self defense". Afghanistan was said to be harboring Al Qaeda and was, therefore, complicit in an outright act of war against the USA."

    The truth - The Taliban government on two occasions in the weeks following 9/11 offered (through diplomatic channels) to hand over Osama bin Laden to the US Justice system. President George W. Bush refused the offer of the Taliban government, intimating that America "does not negotiate with terrorists".
    NATO went to war invoking Article Five of the Washington Treaty: an act of war against one member of NATO is considered an act of war against all members of NATO under the doctrine of collective security.

    Obama - "Despite initial success, for a number of reasons, this war has taken longer than most anticipated. In 2002, bin Laden and his lieutenants escaped across the border and established safe haven in Pakistan. America spent nearly eight years fighting a different war in Iraq. And al Qaeda’s extremist allies within the Taliban have waged a brutal insurgency".

    The truth - Where Osama bin Laden has been was always been known to US intelligence. President Obama conveys the illusion that US-NATO forces and their intelligence operatives could not find bin Laden.

    Obama - "But over the last three years, the tide has turned. We broke the Taliban’s momentum. We’ve built strong Afghan security forces. We devastated al Qaeda’s leadership, taking out over 20 of their top 30 leaders. And one year ago, from a base here in Afghanistan, our troops launched the operation that killed Osama bin Laden. (President Obama also suggests that Al Qaeda operatives equipped with stinger missiles and Kalashnikovs had managed to outsmart the US-NATO multi-trillion dollar military machine.)

    The truth - A lot has been written on this issue. No proof as to the identity of the person who was allegedly killed by the Seals Special Forces. As Paul Craig Roberts said; "The US government’s bin Laden story was so poorly crafted that it did not last 48 hours before being fundamentally altered..."

    Obama - "The goal that I set -- to defeat al Qaeda and deny it a chance to rebuild -- is now within our reach."

    There's lots of evidence that Al Qaeda as US sponsored "intelligence asset" is "live and kicking". Since 9/11, Al Qaeda has developed into a multinational entity with "subsidiaries" in various geopolitical hotspots around the world.
    In Libya and Syria, Al Qaeda brigades are the foot soldiers of the US-NATO military alliance.
    Wherever the US military and intelligence apparatus is deployed, Al Qaeda is present: Al Qaeda in Iraq, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), the Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), Al Shaabab (Somalia), Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM) (Army of Mohammed) (Pakistan), Jemaah Islamiya organization (JI) (Indonesia) Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, etc.
    (See US State Department Foreign Terrorist Organizations, United Nations Security Council, List of individuals, groups, undertakings and other entities associated with Al-Qaida Al-Qaida Sanctions List)
    It is a bitter irony that in all these countries, US intelligence is covertly coordinating the activities of Al Qaeda affiliated groups. Officially counterterrorism consists in fighting the Islamic jihad. Unofficially through covert operations, Western intelligence supports their "assets" including terror entities on the US State Department list.
    Moreover, these various terrorist organizations are now being used in US-NATO covert military operations against sovereign countries (e.g. Libya and Syria). According to Israeli intelligence sources: "NATO headquarters in Brussels and the Turkish high command are meanwhile drawing up plans for their first military step in Syria, which is to arm the rebels with weapons for combating the tanks and helicopters spearheading the Assad regime's crackdown on dissent. Instead of repeating the Libyan model of air strikes, NATO strategists are thinking more in terms of pouring large quantities of anti-tank and anti-air rockets, mortars and heavy machine guns into the protest centers for beating back the government armored forces."(DEBKAfile, NATO to give rebels anti-tank weapons, August 14, 2011)

    Today in 2012, there is ample evidence that:
    1) Al Qaeda was not behind the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon.

    2) There is detailed evidence that agencies of the US government as well as NATO, continue to support and "harbor such organizations" like Al Qaeda and its affiliated organizations. In Libya, the "pro-democracy" rebels were led by Al Qaeda paramilitary brigades under the supervision of NATO Special Forces. The "Liberation" of Tripoli was carried out by "former" members of the Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG). The jihadists and NATO work hand in glove. These "former" Al Qaeda affiliated brigades constitute the backbone of the "pro-democracy" rebellion.

    3) There is mounting evidence that the WTC towers were brought down through controlled demolition, raising the possibility of complicity and cover-up within the US government, intelligence and military. (Richard Gage - Undisputed Facts Point to the Controlled Demolition of WTC 7, Global Research, March 2008, see also video, Richard Gage Controlled Demolitions Caused the Collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on September 11, 2001, Global Research)

    What makes all of this so questionable is:
    For more than a decade, the government has said that Bin Laden is the world’s worst terrorist, a terrorist kingpin, the head of the worst terrorist group in the world.
    But if we captured and interrogated him, he could have spilled a lot of beans which would help prevent future terrorist attacks.
    Atlantic reports today - There’s one option the administration appears to have never seriously considered: taking bin Laden alive.

    The (Obama) administration had made clear to the military’s clandestine Joint Special Operations Command that it wanted bin Laden dead, according to a senior U.S. official with knowledge of the discussions. A high-ranking military officer briefed on the assault said the SEALs knew their mission was not to take him alive.

    Gareth Porter reported yesterday that the U.S. didn’t even consider capturing Bin Laden as part of its Afghanistan war strategy:
    The absence of any military planning to catch bin Laden was a function of Bush’s national security team, led by Vice-President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld, which had firmly opposed any military operation in Afghanistan that would have had any possibility of catching bin Laden and his lieutenants.Rumsfeld and the second-ranking official at the Pentagon, Paul Wolfowitz, had dismissed CIA warnings of an al Qaeda terrorist attack against the United States in the summer of 2001, and even after 9/11 had continued to question the CIA’s conclusion that bin Laden and al Qaeda were behind the attacks.
    Cheney and Rumsfeld were determined not to allow a focus on bin Laden to interfere with their plan for a U.S. invasion of Iraq to overthrow the Saddam Hussein regime.
    Even after Bush decided in favour of an Afghan campaign, CENTCOM commander Tommy Franks, who was responsible for the war in Afghanistan, was not directed to have a plan for bin Laden’s capture or to block his escape to Pakistan. [Background.]
    We tortured a bunch of innocent farmers, children, grandparents and reporters … supposedly to get information about Bin Laden. But it doesn’t seem like the government was very interested in actually interrogating Bin Laden himself.

    The Christian Science Monitor reports today: Some US military intelligence officials also lament that bin Laden was not taken alive – and privately wonder whether concerns about the political “headaches” involved in trying detainees may have led the Obama administration to favor killing rather than capturing the architect of 9/11.

    The opportunity to glean valuable intelligence from the leader of a powerful terrorist organization was lost, says retired Army Col. Stuart Herrington, a military intelligence specialist who interrogated generals under the command of Saddam Hussein and evaluated US detention operations at Guantánamo.
    It is a misconception that ideologues don’t talk, he says. “The opinion that, ‘Oh, he’s such a fanatic, he won’t tell us anything’ – that’s uninformed blathering by people who don’t understand the business,” Herrington adds.

    The ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee said that the executive order stated that Bin Laden should be killed.

    In 2008 Former deputy national intelligence officer for transnational threats, a 23-year senior CIA analyst, who “drafted or was involved in many of the government’s most senior assessments of the threats facing our country; who devoted years to understanding and combating the jihadist threat”, writes today in the Washington Post that the neocons have whipped us into an irrational fear of the terrorism. In reality, “Osama bin Laden and his disciples are small men and secondary threats whose shadows are made large by our fears” and our leaders.

    The BBC produced a documentary called The Power of Nightmares in 2005 that showed that politicians were greatly exaggerating the terrorist threat for political ends.

    In 2009 a United States Congressman claims that the Bush administration intentionally let Bin Laden escape in order to justify the Iraq war.

    Isn’t it time we defend our country, our nation, our US Constitution from the domestic enemies destroying it? It is past time to arrest and prosecute them before things happen that we cannot live with – if what they do is all hidden, lied about, etc – then it cannot be good for us.

  3. 3
    Goldwing Says:

    Outstanding article Brandon. A well explained and insightful look at the question, “what is the new world order?” The facts speak for themselves. The New World Order may not be an originization unto itself, but it is a fact that it exists as an ideology by the worlds eletist whom believe they can build a better world. The one country that stands in the way of their idiology is the United States and it’s constitution. They smell blood in the water and are circiling, ready to move in for the kill.

  4. 4
    owleyone Says:

    Thank you so very much for this article Brandon. I have been searching a long time for such an article to share with family and friends who have resisted information on the NWO.
    And thank you Oath Keepers!!! I sleep better at night knowing men and women of integrity, stand up with dignity and honor to defend our most sacred document… the Constitution. You all are the very best our country has to offer. Carry yourselves with pride and KNOW the citizens support you 100%!
    Bless you all

  5. 5
    Cal Says:

    The New World Order tried a few times in history to put the world under the “hidden” elite groups domination.

    Like Germany – What happened in Germany in the past was not a “fast” takeover – the destruction of its legitimate government was done slowly over a decade, and quite possibly 2 or more decades. (As it is happening today here in the USA.)

    Below are some of the actual plans (from the Nuremberg Trial) that happened then and are known to us today to overthrow that legitimate government; the way it is being used now complete with the lessons learned in the previous attempts (especially from what happened in Hitler’s Germany) that were modified and are being used now against the USA, and the world.

    The Nazis had a plan way before they took over, each step it would take, what step would follow the other – leaving the populace with the feeling something was not right, but no true idea of what the real problem was. Never before in legal history has an effort been made to bring within the scope of a single litigation the developments of plan that covered a decade or more, covering a whole continent, and involving a score of nations, countless individuals, and innumerable events.

    “We know that the Nazi Party was not put in power by a majority of the German vote”, Justice Robert H. Jackson, Chief of Counsel for the United States.

    The chief instrumentality of cohesion in plan and action was the National Socialist German Workers Party, known as the Nazi Party. They were to infiltrate the legitimate government from within and bring about “change”. The first part of the “plan” was to subvert the Weimar Republic. I believe that is what we are seeing here now that I have read the information from the Nuremberg Trial.

    Some of the declared purposes sounded good to many good citizens, such as: “profit-sharing in the great industries,” (Take from the 1% and share with all) “generous development of provision for old age,” “creation and maintenance of a healthy middle class,” “a land reform suitable to our national requirements,” (Us land given to Russia, others, and “authority over our oceans to the UN) and “raising the standard of health.” (Obamacare) The Party said that a strong centralized government was needed. It demanded the creation of a strong central power with unconditional authority, nationalization of all businesses, which had been “amalgamated,” and a “reconstruction” of the educational system. The National Socialist German Workers Party felt it was needed to end civil liberties and there could be no freedom of the press – the press had to completely support the Party.

    The Nazi plans for the overthrow of, and then the “capture” of the legitimate central government.

    There was practiced violent interference with elections. (New Black Panthers, etc) There were reports of the SD describing in detail how its members later violated the secrecy of elections in order to identify those who opposed them. (Election Fraud)

    The Party organization had its own source of law in the Führer and sub-Führer, (Clinton, Bush, and Obama ignoring the US Constitution – the Highest law of OUR land, and doing whatever they wanted) it had its own courts and its own police. (Put their own Justices into our court systems: Supreme Court and lower courts trying to use “International or Shariah law to try cases here in the USA which is under US Constitutional law ONLY).

    A separate government was set up within the legitimate government (Obama’s Czars) within the Party to exercise outside the law every sanction that any legitimate state could exercise and many that it could not. The Party had its own secret police, its security units, its intelligence and espionage division, its raiding forces, and its youth forces (DHS, TSA, Obama youth on It also established administrative mechanisms over time (Patriot Act, NDAA, warrantless searches, warrantless spying, etc) to identify those who supported the legitimate government. They “encouraged” the populace to inform on their own neighbors, friends, family (See Something, Say Something the DHS put out here in America).

    “Uncontrolled search and seizure is one of the first and most effective weapons in the arsenal of every arbitrary government. Among deprivations of rights, none is so effective in cowing a population, crushing the spirit of the individual and putting terror in every heart.”
    Justice Robert Jackson, chief U.S. prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials

    Eventually they organized and dominated every phase of German life (as is being tried here thru the UN laws, and executive orders, bills, laws made here). They created a “Party” police system which became the pattern and the instrument of the police state, which was the first goal in their plan. (DHS and TSA – starting to arrange themselves throughout our nation to control our every move: at airports, bus stations, train stations, on our own roadways (we built – until Obama gave that work to China, and the cars to Finland, etc while we still pay them for it – and paid for) where we can go, etc).

    The Germans of the 1920’s were a frustrated and baffled people as a result of defeat and the disintegration of their traditional government, and the seeming “benefits” extolled by the Nazi party throughout their takeover of the tradional and legitimate government there. (The American people are confused, with most feeling something is not right here, but not sure what the problem is)

    Those decree’s were restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion – including freedom of the press, on the right of peaceful assembly, the right of association, and violations of the privacy: postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications; and no need for warrants for house-searches, orders for, confiscations as well as restrictions on property, etc all taken away under the guise of “keeping the people safe”. Significantly (much like what is happening within the USA today) many were arrested as “belligerents” – no real crime committed, just disagreeing with the destruction of their legitimate government.

    The German Constitution itself authorized the temporary suspension of fundamental rights “in the interest of “public safety” and “to keep order” in the German Reich.

    this action left the Nazi police and party formations (already existing and functioning under Hitler) in control – completely unrestrained and irresponsible.

    Secret arrests and indefinite detention; without charges, without evidence, without hearing, without counsel, and no court could issue an injunction, or writ of habeas corpus, or certiorari. The German people were in the hands of the police, the police were in the hands of the Nazi Party, and the Party was in the hands of a ring of evil men who wanted a New World Order.

    The Nazi conspiracy, as was shown during the Nuremberg trail, always contemplated not just overcoming current opposition but exterminating elements which could not be reconciled with its philosophy of the state.

    Religions that supported peace, liberties, individual choices instead of the “common good” had to be ended. Religious persecution was clothed in the language of religious liberty, “We demand liberty for all religious denominations in the State…”so far as they are not a danger to it and do not militate against the morality and moral sense of the German race.”
    The Party program foreshadowed the campaign of terrorism. It announced, “We demand ruthless war upon those whose activities are injurious to the common interests”, and it demanded that such offenses be punished with death. (Torture, imprisonment)

    This takeover from within the German regime itself did not just happen; it was planned and prepared for over a long period of time and with no small skill and cunning. Their seizure of the German State, the takeover of the legitimate government there, their subjugation of the German people, their terrorism and extermination of dissident elements, all these are ends for which they acted in concert; and all these are phases of the conspiracy, a conspiracy which reached one goal only to set out for another and more ambitious one.

    I am currently writing about this, and it seems to me that today is the NWO making another attempt.
    Does anyone else think those actions sound VERY familiar?

  6. 6
    Cal Says:

    Sorry, I didn’t take out all my own comments .. a kind of “note to self” thing.

  7. 7
    stat Says:

    you guys give me hope for the country.

  8. 8
    gaian Says:

    yo – check this out – this video spells the new world order pretty well. the new world order has been spoken about openly and often by world leaders for decades.

    seriously, after you see one after another of these people talk about it, for a couple of hours, it’s firmly established as a fact.

    Jason Bermas presents Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined


  9. 9
    1776 Says:

    Good article Brandon Smith!

    Take a look at the link below to see a page from the lostliberty1 blog that has a remarkable collection of quotes on the new world order that go back nearly a century and continues through the present era.

Leave a Reply

© 2012 | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148