<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things to Consider Before Supporting Any Candidate for Public Office</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/</link>
	<description>Guardians of the Republic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:17:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-2/#comment-10286</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 04:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-10286</guid>
		<description>So the President must be your hero! Hooray! I mean, he being a former Constitutional law professor who has actually, for the first time in many years, stayed within the boundaries of the Executive branch and not interfered in the activities of the Legislative; he who has proven repeatedly that he is not focused on re-election, but rather on accomplishing much needed progressive reforms; he who has, even as an Illinois Senator, expanded rights of gun owners; he who has made hard choices to fix the damage done by the previous administration (an administration, by the way, that brought us closest to the brink of fascist totalitarianism than ever before in our history); and he who by his behavior, and not rhetoric, embodies the Americanism and family values that too many so-called conservatives think are lacking in the world today.
It&#039;s good to have heroes. 
It&#039;s also good to be mindful of cognitive dissonance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the President must be your hero! Hooray! I mean, he being a former Constitutional law professor who has actually, for the first time in many years, stayed within the boundaries of the Executive branch and not interfered in the activities of the Legislative; he who has proven repeatedly that he is not focused on re-election, but rather on accomplishing much needed progressive reforms; he who has, even as an Illinois Senator, expanded rights of gun owners; he who has made hard choices to fix the damage done by the previous administration (an administration, by the way, that brought us closest to the brink of fascist totalitarianism than ever before in our history); and he who by his behavior, and not rhetoric, embodies the Americanism and family values that too many so-called conservatives think are lacking in the world today.<br />
It&#8217;s good to have heroes.<br />
It&#8217;s also good to be mindful of cognitive dissonance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-2/#comment-8069</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-8069</guid>
		<description>god bless you all in the oathkeepers!!!!!!!!!!!!THE STATUE OF LIBERTY STILL STANDS,if these politicians do not understand the oath they took the should step down,claim ignorance,and go home.                          just mary</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>god bless you all in the oathkeepers!!!!!!!!!!!!THE STATUE OF LIBERTY STILL STANDS,if these politicians do not understand the oath they took the should step down,claim ignorance,and go home.                          just mary</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-2/#comment-7921</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-7921</guid>
		<description>How about WWII FDR purposely put us navy ships in a direct attack. He got us in WWII to end the depression. Your all slaves to the government. Last time our country won a war was in 18th century. 

I want to bring back slavery, that is a business man makes money plus its what our founding fathers wanted. So long terrorists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about WWII FDR purposely put us navy ships in a direct attack. He got us in WWII to end the depression. Your all slaves to the government. Last time our country won a war was in 18th century. </p>
<p>I want to bring back slavery, that is a business man makes money plus its what our founding fathers wanted. So long terrorists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arizona health insurance</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-2/#comment-7890</link>
		<dc:creator>arizona health insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-7890</guid>
		<description>This country is far from beaten. What the brit hasn&#039;t seen is the sleeping anger that american citizens build just before they put their boots on and go to kicking. Our government has foolishly tested those lines this time and it won&#039;t be forgotten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This country is far from beaten. What the brit hasn&#8217;t seen is the sleeping anger that american citizens build just before they put their boots on and go to kicking. Our government has foolishly tested those lines this time and it won&#8217;t be forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Carney</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-2/#comment-7472</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Carney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-7472</guid>
		<description>It was not so long ago that more than 450,000 Americans gave their lives in World War II to defeat Italy, Germany, and Japan in what surely was the greatest conflict in the history of the world.
 
Are we today, less endangered? I say; No, we are more endangered. 
 
Why? In the 1940&#039;s we fought and defeated &quot;countries&quot;. namely, Italy, Germany, and Japan. Those geographical entities were easily identified as the enemy and the allies effectively coordinated to defeat them. We are the beneficiaries of that &quot;Greatest Generation.&quot; 
 
Today, we war not with countries, but with &quot;culture.&quot; We deal politically with countries harboring this obscene culture; even those that are training our enemies who would kill us all; destroy America, and have any  survivors bow to an Islamic idol. 
 
How do we defeat this? You and I must maintain constant, unrelenting, tremendous pressure upon elected representatives to recall; to remember; indeed, to memorize their oath: &quot;To Preserve, Protect, and Defend The Constitution of The United States Against All Enemies, Foreign or Domestic, so Help Me God.&quot;
 
I took that oath as an officer in the United States Army. That I am no longer on active duty does not relieve me of my Patriot Duties. Nor does it you. 
 
Stay frosty.
Stay active.
Never surrender.
Never.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was not so long ago that more than 450,000 Americans gave their lives in World War II to defeat Italy, Germany, and Japan in what surely was the greatest conflict in the history of the world.</p>
<p>Are we today, less endangered? I say; No, we are more endangered. </p>
<p>Why? In the 1940&#8217;s we fought and defeated &#8220;countries&#8221;. namely, Italy, Germany, and Japan. Those geographical entities were easily identified as the enemy and the allies effectively coordinated to defeat them. We are the beneficiaries of that &#8220;Greatest Generation.&#8221; </p>
<p>Today, we war not with countries, but with &#8220;culture.&#8221; We deal politically with countries harboring this obscene culture; even those that are training our enemies who would kill us all; destroy America, and have any  survivors bow to an Islamic idol. </p>
<p>How do we defeat this? You and I must maintain constant, unrelenting, tremendous pressure upon elected representatives to recall; to remember; indeed, to memorize their oath: &#8220;To Preserve, Protect, and Defend The Constitution of The United States Against All Enemies, Foreign or Domestic, so Help Me God.&#8221;</p>
<p>I took that oath as an officer in the United States Army. That I am no longer on active duty does not relieve me of my Patriot Duties. Nor does it you. </p>
<p>Stay frosty.<br />
Stay active.<br />
Never surrender.<br />
Never.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victoria</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-2/#comment-7405</link>
		<dc:creator>Victoria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 16:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-7405</guid>
		<description>Thank you Stewart for the courage of this fine organization.  I URGE everyone to watch this video to really understand HOW SERIOUS the threat to our Republic is!  This is a long video but worth every second!  Educate yourself as to WHY Oath Keepers is CRITICAL to defend our Republic!  I will be supporting Oath Keepers ongoingly!  WATCH THIS!   http://bit.ly/jbraR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Stewart for the courage of this fine organization.  I URGE everyone to watch this video to really understand HOW SERIOUS the threat to our Republic is!  This is a long video but worth every second!  Educate yourself as to WHY Oath Keepers is CRITICAL to defend our Republic!  I will be supporting Oath Keepers ongoingly!  WATCH THIS!   <a href="http://bit.ly/jbraR" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/jbraR</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: concretebob</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-2/#comment-7308</link>
		<dc:creator>concretebob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 05:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-7308</guid>
		<description>Stewart, you should reconsider your support for Adam Kokesh. 
http://unitedconservatives.blogspot.com/2010/02/infil-traitor.html
http://unitedconservatives.blogspot.com/2010/02/wst-picks-loser.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stewart, you should reconsider your support for Adam Kokesh.<br />
<a href="http://unitedconservatives.blogspot.com/2010/02/infil-traitor.html" rel="nofollow">http://unitedconservatives.blogspot.com/2010/02/infil-traitor.html</a><br />
<a href="http://unitedconservatives.blogspot.com/2010/02/wst-picks-loser.html" rel="nofollow">http://unitedconservatives.blogspot.com/2010/02/wst-picks-loser.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack calame</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-1/#comment-7260</link>
		<dc:creator>jack calame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-7260</guid>
		<description>A critical moment in history, concerning the Freedom for Christian Americans is approaching fast. This president is a clandestine muslim and he is beginning his first stages of desperation as many of his voters are wising up. He is rapidly losing supporters and he is likely to implement strategies to drastically undermine our bill of rights soon. The Oath Keepers may have been born at just the right moment.     Remember, if the &quot;southern poverty law center&quot; is alarmed by it, then it&#039;s a good organization for freedom including white rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A critical moment in history, concerning the Freedom for Christian Americans is approaching fast. This president is a clandestine muslim and he is beginning his first stages of desperation as many of his voters are wising up. He is rapidly losing supporters and he is likely to implement strategies to drastically undermine our bill of rights soon. The Oath Keepers may have been born at just the right moment.     Remember, if the &#8220;southern poverty law center&#8221; is alarmed by it, then it&#8217;s a good organization for freedom including white rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Eastwood</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-1/#comment-7180</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Eastwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-7180</guid>
		<description>Here is a little food for thought concerning the defense of the constitution. There are,I regret to say amendments to the constitution that I will not defend. They are: the reconstruction acts, the expatriation act and the 14th amendment. 
Let me explaine.Before the 14th amendment was established,the post civil war congress (rump) instituted its parallel predessors:
The reconstruction acts which ammounted to a bill of attainder against every man woman and child in america-all at once.Andrew Jackson stated:&quot;Such a power has not been wielded by and Monarch in England for more than five hundred years. In all that time no people who speak the english language have borne such servitude. It reduces the whole population of the 10 states-all persons,of everycolor,sex,and condition, and every stranger within their limits-to the most abject and degrading slavery. No master never had a control so absolute control over the slaves as this bill gives to the military officers over both white and colored persons&quot;...
Then the expatriation act passed the day before the 14th amendment was {illegally} ratified. This act basically declaired that all Americans would &quot;naturalized citizens&quot;,to be called &quot;federal citizens&quot; by the 14th amendment on the following day.
Why would they want us to be federal citizens? Arent we already American citizens?
The answer to that question lies in the 14th amendment itself.
The preamble states &quot;Rights of the American citizen in foreign states&quot;. What foreign states? Foreign to whom? The answer is foreign to the federal government about to be set-up.
It further states that &quot;such American citizens,with their decendants,are subjects of foreign states {eg mass,conn,etc...}owing their allegiance to the governments thereof;and whereas it is necessary to the maintance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed. In other words to become a federal citizen {or a citizen of the United States}you must necessairly disavow your allegiance to your present government  &quot;ie your state&quot; That is the government that the first 12 amendments established. 
How can Americans be forced to do that? We cannot be forced...but we can be tricked into it.
And the way we can be tricked into it is the 14th amendment.
The primary purpose of the 14th amendment is to place Americans into a situation where they un-wittingly forfeit their natural rights and collective rights to the federal government.
The 14th amendment states &quot;but when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for pres.,vp,reps.in congress....therefore is &quot;denied&quot; to any of the male inhabitants of such state being 21 years of age,and a citizen of the United States or in any way abridged,&#039;EXCEPT for PARTICIPATION IN REBELLION OR OTHER CRIME&quot;...
Whan in the hell are they talking about?What rebellion?What crime? They are stating that I must participate in rebellion or crime to vote?Remember that the federal government didnt even exist until this amendment was ratified. The rebellion and crime was voting in a federal election. We commit the &quot;crime of rebellion&quot; against the laws of our soverign governments {ie the state we were born in or live in} when we vote in a federal election.Remember the federal government considers all of the states to be &quot;foreign&quot;to it..and so we are. It would be the same thing if you were to go to mexico and vote in an election.It is a crime and that crime is treason.However once you have comitted this crime,you become a citizen of the federal government and are subject to its laws.
Very sneaky this 14th amendment.
Check out the validity of my statements @pacinlaw.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a little food for thought concerning the defense of the constitution. There are,I regret to say amendments to the constitution that I will not defend. They are: the reconstruction acts, the expatriation act and the 14th amendment.<br />
Let me explaine.Before the 14th amendment was established,the post civil war congress (rump) instituted its parallel predessors:<br />
The reconstruction acts which ammounted to a bill of attainder against every man woman and child in america-all at once.Andrew Jackson stated:&#8221;Such a power has not been wielded by and Monarch in England for more than five hundred years. In all that time no people who speak the english language have borne such servitude. It reduces the whole population of the 10 states-all persons,of everycolor,sex,and condition, and every stranger within their limits-to the most abject and degrading slavery. No master never had a control so absolute control over the slaves as this bill gives to the military officers over both white and colored persons&#8221;&#8230;<br />
Then the expatriation act passed the day before the 14th amendment was {illegally} ratified. This act basically declaired that all Americans would &#8220;naturalized citizens&#8221;,to be called &#8220;federal citizens&#8221; by the 14th amendment on the following day.<br />
Why would they want us to be federal citizens? Arent we already American citizens?<br />
The answer to that question lies in the 14th amendment itself.<br />
The preamble states &#8220;Rights of the American citizen in foreign states&#8221;. What foreign states? Foreign to whom? The answer is foreign to the federal government about to be set-up.<br />
It further states that &#8220;such American citizens,with their decendants,are subjects of foreign states {eg mass,conn,etc&#8230;}owing their allegiance to the governments thereof;and whereas it is necessary to the maintance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed. In other words to become a federal citizen {or a citizen of the United States}you must necessairly disavow your allegiance to your present government  &#8220;ie your state&#8221; That is the government that the first 12 amendments established.<br />
How can Americans be forced to do that? We cannot be forced&#8230;but we can be tricked into it.<br />
And the way we can be tricked into it is the 14th amendment.<br />
The primary purpose of the 14th amendment is to place Americans into a situation where they un-wittingly forfeit their natural rights and collective rights to the federal government.<br />
The 14th amendment states &#8220;but when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for pres.,vp,reps.in congress&#8230;.therefore is &#8220;denied&#8221; to any of the male inhabitants of such state being 21 years of age,and a citizen of the United States or in any way abridged,&#8217;EXCEPT for PARTICIPATION IN REBELLION OR OTHER CRIME&#8221;&#8230;<br />
Whan in the hell are they talking about?What rebellion?What crime? They are stating that I must participate in rebellion or crime to vote?Remember that the federal government didnt even exist until this amendment was ratified. The rebellion and crime was voting in a federal election. We commit the &#8220;crime of rebellion&#8221; against the laws of our soverign governments {ie the state we were born in or live in} when we vote in a federal election.Remember the federal government considers all of the states to be &#8220;foreign&#8221;to it..and so we are. It would be the same thing if you were to go to mexico and vote in an election.It is a crime and that crime is treason.However once you have comitted this crime,you become a citizen of the federal government and are subject to its laws.<br />
Very sneaky this 14th amendment.<br />
Check out the validity of my statements @pacinlaw.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brutus</title>
		<link>http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/01/06/things-to-consider-before-supporting-any-candidate-for-public-office/comment-page-1/#comment-7111</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oathkeepers.org/oath/?p=3216#comment-7111</guid>
		<description>Wow! Obviously, a few people are not voting for a candidate that will adhere to the delegated limitations of the constitution, but rather, a personal agenda.

Mr. Rhodes, while you can lead these people to water ... it is obvious that not many are willing to drink it. For if they did, it would require of these people self responsibility and the ability to live freely without chains. Something that most people are not willing to do.

So sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Obviously, a few people are not voting for a candidate that will adhere to the delegated limitations of the constitution, but rather, a personal agenda.</p>
<p>Mr. Rhodes, while you can lead these people to water &#8230; it is obvious that not many are willing to drink it. For if they did, it would require of these people self responsibility and the ability to live freely without chains. Something that most people are not willing to do.</p>
<p>So sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.291 seconds -->

