I Clearly understood the Oath I took
I enlisted in the U.S. Navy in 1984 and served through 1992 with my last station being the Naval Investigative Service (now NCIS). Even at 18 when I gave my oath I clearly understood the significance of the wording and placement. “…support and defend the Constitution…” was intentionally and specifically placed ahead of “…obey the orders of the President…” Our forefathers respected the need for unit cohesion but understood more clearly that our Constitution would be under constant threat and that we needed to be ever vigilant. “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them, will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” Thomas Jefferson.
Wake up homeless? I can take that. I was poor most of childhood until the military gave me the opportunity to “man-up” by pulling myself up from my bootstraps, then showing me even though my childhood was bad there could be worse things in the world. I’ve learned that my children would be better off poor and homeless eking out an existence on their own than living under a Gestapo regime or worse yet, within some internment camp. Dark clouds are gathering and the Guardians of the Republic are our last hope. For America’s sake ALL active duty military and police must honor the commitment that we swore to support and defend. I for one reaffirm my commitment to it! WILL YOU? “It’s [NOT] just a goddamned piece of paper!” GWBush 2005
Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!
December 15th, 2009 at 7:54 am
Thanks for your service and welcome aboard! You make us stronger.
Make sure you check out your state group for other protectors in your area.
December 15th, 2009 at 11:23 am
Thank you for your service to our Nation and its people.
Thank you for standing up for your beliefs.
Welcome to Oath Keepers.
Eddie Gilbert
USMC SSgt 70-78
Peace Officer 97-present
December 17th, 2009 at 6:26 am
Thank you for your service to our country and for your oath. Welcome, we are glad you here with us at Oathkeepers.
December 23rd, 2009 at 8:27 am
Write Agency,trust professional historical asset especially promote anyone surface message plastic experience other season we part empty campaign settle suggestion reading school before take control could rule imagine release weekend look nearly cover rise death star safety exist him skill not industrial male rain apply try disease first complete individual rain extent talk example single teach branch refer compare tape attractive service effort selection deal stock leadership generally shall painting ship where sing media below copy contribute like big transport launch die transport exchange environment enough
December 28th, 2009 at 10:11 pm
http://www.starbulletin.com > News >
Watada discharged
The Army grants the officer’s resignation under “other than honorable conditions”
By Gregg K. Kakesako
POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Sep 26, 2009
(Single Page View) | Return to Paginated View
First Lt. Ehren Watada, the first commissioned military officer to refuse deployment to Iraq because he believed it was an illegal war, has won his three-year legal battle with the Army.
With little fanfare the Army at Fort Lewis, Wash., accepted the resignation of the 1996 Kalani High School graduate, and he will be discharged the first week in October.
Rather than seek a second court-martial against the artillery officer, the Army will grant Watada a discharge under “other than honorable conditions.”
Joseph J. Piek, Fort Lewis spokesman, said, “This is an administrative discharge, and the characterization of Lt. Watada’s discharge is not releasable under the privacy act.”
Watada, 31, told the Star-Bulletin in a phone interview yesterday that he was “glad to finally bring this chapter to a close and to move on.”
“The actual outcome is different from the outcome that I envisioned in the first place, but I am grateful of the outcome.”
Watada said he was “thankful to the people from all walks of life that supported me and agreed with my stand.”
In May, Watada won a significant legal victory when the U.S. Department of Justice dropped efforts to retry him. The Army had wanted to appeal U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle’s decision last October that a second court-martial would violate Watada’s constitutional protection against double jeopardy.
Following the Justice Department’s decision, the Army made it clear the only course available to Watada is what the Army calls “resignation for the good of the service in lieu of general court-martial,” Watada said yesterday.
Watada could either voluntarily resign or be forced out with a discharge “under other than honorable conditions.”
Watada said the result would be the same, except it would take longer if he was forced out.
Ken Kagan, one of Watada’s Seattle attorneys, said last night, “Lt. Watada had previously tendered his resignation on more than one occasion, and each time, it was rejected. This time, however, it was accepted, apparently only when the Army realized it could not defeat Lt. Watada in a courtroom.”
Kagan described Watada as “a hero and a patriot. Lt. Watada took a lonely stand as a matter of conscience, never attempted to spread discord within the ranks and never sought to evangelize about his ethical convictions. More importantly, he never disparaged the service and the sacrifices made by countless other soldiers and officers who obeyed their orders. He realized that each member of the armed forces must make her or his own decision, according to the dictates of conscience, just as he did. He always understood it to be an intensely personal decision.
“It is our belief that history will treat Lt. Watada far more favorably than the United States Army sees fit to regard him now.”
Watada said he turned in his resignation papers in July, and they were approved by the commanding general at Fort Lewis and sent to his higher headquarters. Watada learned of the Army’s final approval on Sept. 16.
Watada said that he does not know whether he will stay in the Pacific Northwest, where he attended Whitworth College, or return to the islands.
Before he was charged, Watada, an artillery officer, had requested to be assigned to Afghanistan instead of Iraq and even offered to resign from the Army. Both requests were denied.
Initially, Watada was charged with missing the 2nd Infantry Division’s 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team’s deployment on June 22, 2006, considered by the Army as the most serious charge, and conduct unbec- oming an officer.
Watada participated in anti-war rallies here and on the mainland and held numerous interviews denouncing Bush. Two of those activities were the basis of the charges of conduct unbecoming an officer. Conviction on all counts would have meant six years in prison and a dishonorable discharge.
One of his biggest supporters was his father, Bob Watada, who retired to farm in Eugene, Ore.
“I am very happy he is getting out,” the elder Watada said, “and getting on with his life.
“I firmly believe he did the right thing. I supported him all the way, and I continue to support him.”
Watada’s first court-martial ended in a mistrial in February 2007 when military judge Lt. Col. John Head believed that Watada did not understand the terms of a plea agreement. He had been charged with denouncing President George W. Bush and the Iraq war and refusing to join his Stryker brigade unit when it deployed.
The mistrial occurred before Watada’s attorney could put on a defense.
To block a second court-martial, Watada’s attorneys sued in U.S. District Court.
The Army had been contemplating prosecuting Watada for his anti-war sentiments, citing statements against the war and Bush that were not part of the original court-martial. Watada could have been court-martialed for conduct unbecoming an officer for making those statements.
However, Piek said yesterday, the last two remaining specifications under Article 133, conduct unbecoming an officer, have been dismissed.
Watada, who has been working a desk job since the mistrial, was supposed to have been discharged on December 2006, but his legal proceedings have kept him at Fort Lewis’ I Corps.
The 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team served three combat tours in Iraq.
First Lt. Ehren Watada, the first commissioned military officer to refuse deployment to Iraq because he believed it was an illegal war, has won his three-year legal battle with the Army.
FL MORRIS / DECEMBER 2006
View Large Version >>With little fanfare the Army at Fort Lewis, Wash., accepted the resignation of the 1996 Kalani High School graduate, and he will be discharged the first week in October.
Rather than seek a second court-martial against the artillery officer, the Army will grant Watada a discharge under “other than honorable conditions.”
Joseph J. Piek, Fort Lewis spokesman, said, “This is an administrative discharge, and the characterization of Lt. Watada’s discharge is not releasable under the privacy act.”
Watada, 31, told the Star-Bulletin in a phone interview yesterday that he was “glad to finally bring this chapter to a close and to move on.”
“The actual outcome is different from the outcome that I envisioned in the first place, but I am grateful of the outcome.”
Watada said he was “thankful to the people from all walks of life that supported me and agreed with my stand.”
In May, Watada won a significant legal victory when the U.S. Department of Justice dropped efforts to retry him. The Army had wanted to appeal U.S. District Judge Benjamin Settle’s decision last October that a second court-martial would violate Watada’s constitutional protection against double jeopardy.
Following the Justice Department’s decision, the Army made it clear the only course available to Watada is what the Army calls “resignation for the good of the service in lieu of general court-martial,” Watada said yesterday.
Watada could either voluntarily resign or be forced out with a discharge “under other than honorable conditions.”
Watada said the result would be the same, except it would take longer if he was forced out.
Ken Kagan, one of Watada’s Seattle attorneys, said last night, “Lt. Watada had previously tendered his resignation on more than one occasion, and each time, it was rejected. This time, however, it was accepted, apparently only when the Army realized it could not defeat Lt. Watada in a courtroom.”
Kagan described Watada as “a hero and a patriot. Lt. Watada took a lonely stand as a matter of conscience, never attempted to spread discord within the ranks and never sought to evangelize about his ethical convictions. More importantly, he never disparaged the service and the sacrifices made by countless other soldiers and officers who obeyed their orders. He realized that each member of the armed forces must make her or his own decision, according to the dictates of conscience, just as he did. He always understood it to be an intensely personal decision.
“It is our belief that history will treat Lt. Watada far more favorably than the United States Army sees fit to regard him now.”
Watada said he turned in his resignation papers in July, and they were approved by the commanding general at Fort Lewis and sent to his higher headquarters. Watada learned of the Army’s final approval on Sept. 16.
Watada said that he does not know whether he will stay in the Pacific Northwest, where he attended Whitworth College, or return to the islands.
Before he was charged, Watada, an artillery officer, had requested to be assigned to Afghanistan instead of Iraq and even offered to resign from the Army. Both requests were denied.
Initially, Watada was charged with missing the 2nd Infantry Division’s 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team’s deployment on June 22, 2006, considered by the Army as the most serious charge, and conduct unbec- oming an officer.
Watada participated in anti-war rallies here and on the mainland and held numerous interviews denouncing Bush. Two of those activities were the basis of the charges of conduct unbecoming an officer. Conviction on all counts would have meant six years in prison and a dishonorable discharge.
One of his biggest supporters was his father, Bob Watada, who retired to farm in Eugene, Ore.
“I am very happy he is getting out,” the elder Watada said, “and getting on with his life.
“I firmly believe he did the right thing. I supported him all the way, and I continue to support him.”
Watada’s first court-martial ended in a mistrial in February 2007 when military judge Lt. Col. John Head believed that Watada did not understand the terms of a plea agreement. He had been charged with denouncing President George W. Bush and the Iraq war and refusing to join his Stryker brigade unit when it deployed.
The mistrial occurred before Watada’s attorney could put on a defense.
To block a second court-martial, Watada’s attorneys sued in U.S. District Court.
The Army had been contemplating prosecuting Watada for his anti-war sentiments, citing statements against the war and Bush that were not part of the original court-martial. Watada could have been court-martialed for conduct unbecoming an officer for making those statements.
However, Piek said yesterday, the last two remaining specifications under Article 133, conduct unbecoming an officer, have been dismissed.
Watada, who has been working a desk job since the mistrial, was supposed to have been discharged on December 2006, but his legal proceedings have kept him at Fort Lewis’ I Corps.
The 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team served three combat tours in Iraq.