October 21st, 2009

Oath Keepers founder plays ‘Hardball’

hardballGun Rights Examiner

David Codrea

Colleague Kurt Hofmann, the St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner also asked “How is a vow to uphold the Constitution a ‘threat’?” Matthews and his special gang-up guest, Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law center did their best to make it appear that it is.

Anyone at all familiar with MSNBC should not be surprised.

They started with a classic trick–focusing in on points they thought they could exploit to create a negative impression, in this case, only four of the 10 orders Oath Keepers will not obey, presented with no context, of course. And Matthews used his trademark bullying style in an attempt to dismiss Stewart’s direct response to questioning.

His very first question, “Do you guys have the current firepower to stand up to the federal government?” is what’s known as a “lie.” The point of Oath Keepers is to stand down, and Matthews knows it.

Matthews then makes a big deal about Oath Keepers being “potentially armed.” We’re talking current and retired police and military, so one would expect that to be so in many cases, but again, he’s ignoring Stewart’s answer and trying to paint the group as violence initiators.

Notice when Stewart brings up My Lai, Matthews doesn’t want to listen because it’s in the past. Yet Matthews feels free to bring up whether or not Oath Keepers would have stood down in the Civil War during the discussion on state sovereignty–not so subtly equating people who wish to restore Constitutional principles of federalism with antebellum Southern slave owners.

Continued Here

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. Due to time constraints, we dont moderate or pre-approve comments and cannot read each and every comment, but we will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments when we become aware of them.

39 Comments »

  1. Click link above to watch video

  2. In my opinion, Oath Keepers will win regardless of what the News Mafia does. In fact, in my opinion if the majority of the Public refuses to give up their Guns unconstitutionally no matter what, or if the majority of the Public even refuses to pay taxes, then here’s what I predict will happen if the Govt persists and why:

    1. The Government collapses.
    2. The reason for 1 is that no major Dictator in history has ever had the Manpower, not to mention trusting the loyalty of the Manpower that they had, to arrest or murder half or more of their population – not Hitler, not Stalin, not Mao, not Putin, etc. They had to be content to arrest and murder relatively few (the “Initial Troublemakers” for example) and then SCARE the rest.
    3. Of course, nobody wants to be one of the initial few arrested. But as long as for example Oath Keepers message continues to spread, and it is, then the majority of the Public will get the message, and the Dictators will either withdraw or collapse. It’s good enough if the message spreads by word of mouth, by phone, by fax, by letter, by email, or whatever.

    Osher Doctorow

  3. If you noticed Matthews did not give Stewart time to completely answer any of his questions. This man is so in the tank with the left that it is sickening. Just remember that when, God forbid, that it comes to pushing back the left will stand around and wonder why we are upset. The do want to take care of us from birth to death. Also did younotice how paranoid Chris was? He and others on his side think that anyone who does not agree to be a lamb to slaughter is some type of radical.
    He and alot of folks on the left are so onesided when it comes to running this country that they think only their views count. Well suprise our views count too.
    Stewart thank you for standing up for us and stating our thoughts.
    One mans thoughts.
    God bless the Republic and Oath Keepers.

  4. All those who are historians uderstand the facts. And they also realize Mr Matthews has at very least an attitude that suggests he was once wanting to become a Detective and the Police dept. decided he wasn’t fit for the postion, now has a blood thirst for showing he is right over whether or not a certain issue is Right. and based upon Individuals Rights

  5. Chris Matthews, disgraced himself trying to disgrace and discredit Oath Keepers.
    Stewart Rhodes, withstood his demeanor and stood tall. His integrity shined through.

    I’m sure our Country saw what he was doing to an honorable man, that has defended our freedom.
    For a man like Chris, to be able to trample, run his mouth and disgrace himself, along with the rest of the Mafia Media Freaks, that don’t care for the Constitution the Republic nor the honor thereof.

    Thank you Stewart !

  6. Chris will be Chris but he met his match Stewart kept his composure and made us all proud thank you Stuart.

  7. Chris Matthews is an example of an officer who took an oath by didn’t have the moral integrity to stand by it. That’s right, Matthews was a DC cop at one time, and I for one, am certainly glad he no longer is one.

  8. Chris Matthews is a lunatic. He has loss creditability with most sane people. The message being sent by the Oath Keepers is true and only reject by people the refuse freedom and Independence. We must watch and react to government’s attachs on our rights.

  9. U. S. Capitol Police according to MSNBC http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080601/

  10. Am I the only one that thinks Mark Potok looks like Leon Trotsky?

  11. Did anyone else find it odd that Chris Matthews asked “What foreign troops do you expect to land on American soil” and then a minute later he mentions “black helicopters from the UN”??? I found that very foretelling.

  12. I could hardly believe Stewart was treated like such sub-human trash. Chris Matthews looks like one of those big-shots that’s high and mighty on a skype session but cowardly when face to face with a man of character and strength.

    And Potok looks like a wimpy sell-out version of George Lucas. I’m soooo scared of those “domestic extremist” veterans who are keeping their oath. God save us all!

  13. This is for the curious people from TV land. Below are video links just for you!
    Here is the information Chris Matthews and Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Law center are afraid of, getting out to the people. Oathkeepers have already have studied this information, and that in part is why they joined. Who in their right mind would want to throw their Rights away to politicians?
    The abuses and contortions of We The People’s MANDATE of the servants that hold power and much or the media have continued so long they must get the weak minded to look away quickly. For those who don’t and end up here, well, here it is in easy video format for your education.

    The Declaration of Independence
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxTvS-kyHzs

    The Bill of Rights
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gV2fys1H5E

    The Constitution for The United States (Part 1/5)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aduME7GFSxk

  14. So let then ask and you will have all the time and space to answer…

    2. We will NOT obey orders to conduct warrantless searches of the American people

    –> So do you not believe in probable cause?

    5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty.

    –>So how do you answer Chris Matthew’s question regarding the Civil War. What about Eisenhower using troops to enforce Brown vs. The Board, Washington putting down the Whiskey Rebellion, and Jackson enforcing the doctrine of nullification.

  15. In reply to Mike, the Spirit of the Constitution is opposed to warrantless searches and invading and subjugating states that assert their sovereignty. The 1st 4 Presidents of the USA (Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison) would have rejected the Civil War, would have rejected Eisenhower using troops to enforce Brown vs. the Board (in fact, Eisenhower frequently was mis-advised by his State Department and others, as with his vendetta against Senator Joe McCarthy), etc.

    “Probable Cause” should be decided by a warrant legally, not by Joe Blow’s intuition.

    Osher Doctorow

  16. Or the use of troops to demolish the “Bonuseers” protest in D.C. under then president Herbert Hoover?

    Read it here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/02/AR2007080200579.html

    Do your homework Chris Matthews, don’t be so willfully ignorant of the historical facts of this nation’s government and military.

    By the way, you are a coward in the face of true integrity…..who’s crony list were you on when you were hired as a D.C. cop?

  17. Are you guys serious? Matthews made him look like a fool on national t.v. I am asking all of you to join me and all of the citizens to visit my site and join the march on washington d.c. to protest this treaty coming in december. Also join the CONTINENTAL CONGRESS 2009 and let us stop all of the bickering over who is who! we will never win divided focus our efforts on one front and use the manpower we have collectively. If you really love this country and want to do something instead of blowing hot air you will join me and draw the line!! thank you and GOD BLESS AMERICA

  18. Giving Chris Matthews the credit of being a fool and a moron would be a insult to fools and morons.

  19. There were three soldiers that stood up against the 26 that took part in the My Lai Massacre. I’d like to locate those three and invite them into Oath Keepers. They stood down when given illegal and unconscionable orders. They held true to their oath. They are examples of the spirit of what Oath Keepers is.

    Let us hope that the spirit, integrity, and morality of those three fine soldiers is what swells within the ranks of our military before the iron fist of tyranny and fascism falls within our own blessed republic.

    May God bless all those that have stood and will stand for what is right.

  20. An article in today’s Gazette was the first we’d ever heard of you. (Where have you been all our life?!?!?) What can we do to help?

  21. # 10 Bill
    You should read my comment at infowars…
    “After this sleazy friggen’ hit piece by that piece of shit Chris Matthews; I signed up at OathKeepers.org. I took my oath in 1972 when I joined the Navy and again in 1973 when I was admitted to the Academy. I highly recommend that any one who is considering joining climb aboard now!!

    What fucking qualifications does Mark Potok have any how? Yale Law? Former Army officer?
    I highly doubt it!! However, he does look like a Trotskyite”

  22. Hello Stewart,

    I’m Kenneth W. Royce, author of the Boston T. Party books found on Amazon:

    http://www.amazon.com/Bostons-Gun-Bible-Boston-Party/dp/1888766069/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1202489808&sr=1-1

    and at http://www.javelinpress.com.

    Thank you for founding such a fine American org, and I wish you all many members.

    I watched the absurd “interview” by Chris Matthews, and thought you did a great job. May I offer some possible quotes for you to use in future interviews? I think you’ve a great opportunity to flip the whole debate around and expose their paranoia about Oath Keepers.

    Keep up the great work, and let me know how I can help! I will be donating money soon.

    For a Constitutional Republic,
    Kenneth W. Royce

    1) “If martial law and oppressive government are unlikely in your opinion, then why are you so paranoid about Oath Keepers? Our members would have no unconstitutional orders to refuse, right?”

    2) “What gun confiscations? You mean like the National Guard forcibly disarming peaceable homeowners after Katrina? Those gun confiscations?”

    3) “Would you have supported Oath Keepers in 1941 had they refused to round up innocent Japanese-Americans for domestic concentration camps? If no, then you agree with that ugly internment? If yes, then what’s your rational objection to Oath Keepers in 2009?”

    4) “Even though Oath Keepers is solely about inaction in the face of unlawful orders, you insist on falsely alleging that our members are planning some kind of insurrection. Isn’t that some kind of conspiracy theory on your part? Why do imagine such paranoid scenarios?”

    5) “Oh, so you believe that police and military cannot act in good conscience and refuse unlawful orders?”

    6) “Can you give a theoretical example of an unconstitutional order, or do you believe that all government orders are always lawful because they come from the government?”

    7) “How many hours a day do I spend in fear of the government? None — not since I founded Oath Keepers and am certain that our police and military now have a clear way to act in good conscience to protect the Constitution.”

    And lastly, a reader’s contribution:

    “If you believe as you claim that ‘obeying orders is no defense’ for wrong actions, then why are you so upset about the idea of police and military refusing to obey orders to take wrong actions?”

    ______________
    The objection that Potok et al have to Oath Keepers reminds me of the illogical sneering that journalist had about Promise Keepers. Let’s see: a group of guys, all strangers, assemble to publicly proclaim renewed loyalty to their wives and children. You’d think that secular journalists wouldn’t care that it’s a Christian org, as the Promise Keepers goal is so unassailably moral, beneficial, and harmless.

    Same with Oath Keepers. The way to stick Potok and his ilk in a corner is to ask them if US Army troops should have refused to intern Japanese-Americans. One can’t blast the internment as unlawful/immoral and yet support the troops’ actions.

  23. You know that it is a small percentage right now and hopefully growing that will be on the side of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. It will be like our founding fathers opposing the British all over again! The 2nd Revolutionary War is about to begin. All it will take is a false flag event or financial colapse or something else that will force martial law upon us. When it happens, it will be the bloodiest War to ever be fought on this Earth. The American Patriot will not give up til dead and the brain dead globalist army will fight like a dumb animal til dead. Unfortuantely, most of those brain dead globalist soldiers will be former US citizens. The day they shoot at their first Patriot defending the US Constitution makes them enemy of the United States Of America. As soon as the first soldier shoots at a Patriot defending the US Constitution, Every officer and government official supporting that shot is enemy of the United States of America. They may have already shot that first shot or supported that first shot and they may already be guilty of treason. When that war starts, then it will be official, the now US Government will no longer be the US Government. They will be the Globalist Government and the real US Government will be those defending the US Constitution. It will not only be a Revolutionary War but also a Civil War all in one. Every US Citizen right now needs to make a decision. Are you a US Citizen or a Global Citizen of the United Nations? You need to pick a side, for there will be no in between.

  24. chris mathews is a stooge of the media. The media is a falsehood entirely. wherever they stand, in KNOW where not to stand.

  25. When Chris Matthews asked if he thought martial law was close, or if he thought they were making consentration camps he said “no” NO didnt you mean Yes? So that made Chris Matthews day, He should of told that things were happening now.

  26. While I agree whole-heartedly with the OK principles, this blog is nothing but a breeding ground (more aptly primordial soup) for some of the most uneducated and idiotic rhetoric I’ve ever heard.

  27. Anonymouse – then maybe you should go away.

  28. Anonymouse doesnt know who is uneducated, she needs to look in the mirror. This site is for the most bravest, educated, and God Lovin people who love our great land and people. Dont need to say more…..

  29. I am a South African but follow world news closely. I have read the declaration of independence and to be honest some of the reasons stated for the independence is currently what is happening in your country at this very moment. I extracted some quotes for you to decide for yourself.

    “He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.” (Bilderburg Group meetings attended by high ranking Government officials, this is a act of treason since nothing discussed in the meeting ever gets shown to congress or the public.)

    “For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:” (carbon taxes, ect)

    “For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:” (patriot act endorsed by obama)

    My country is in tatters filled with corrupt politicians, very high crime rates and a poor economy, I see your country heading in the same direction and pray for all the people of your country.Fight for what you believe in or regret will be your best friend.

  30. chris mathews is a classis asshole. he has a big mouth with nothing to back it up. he is so far left that he go around in cicles.msnbe is a socialist network.he suffers from what is commonlly known as oral diareah

  31. So Chris Mathews was a DC cop, eh ?

    He almost certainly is CIA, then. GODSPEED !

  32. You guys might consider REFUSING to grant windbags like that Mathews maggot another interview. Blacklist him! I watched about 50% of his attack on Mr Rhodes and couldn’t bear to keep watching the idiot. That said, I think your leadership guys should get a ‘coach’ whose function is to teach you how to handle swine like Mathews

  33. Despite what “some” of the media try to do to instill the ideas that OK is a “radical, violent group of gun toting fanatics” I think that particularly with Matthews’ showing of his ignorance, it will only serve to inspire curiousity in people who will in turn visit the website, where they can be better informed as to what Oath Keepers is all about. I am proud to be an Oath Keeper, proud to be an American, and proud to defend the Constitution.

  34. Chris Matthews is smug ex-Peace Corps closet homo who gets thrills up his leg from powerful black men. I do not put any stock in what that fairy says.

  35. Did anyone notice Matthews excluded the MAIN reasons Oathkeepers exists? I think he’s already proven himself to be a media whore for Obama… he said it was his “job” to make sure this Administration succeeds. Why are we even debating this? I, for one, would suggest that we don’t indulge these media outlets in opportunities to do anything of the sort. I could make Jesus Christ look like a nut if I followed the Matthews formula for interviewing adversaries. Why bother? Their audiences are tiny and filled with left wing nutballs. If they want an interview in the future, let them come to us while we dictate the terms. Other than that, let them view and/or comment from afar. I’m an Oathkeeper, I’m fairly intelligent, pragmatic, sensible, have an abundance of common sense, have been a cop for 34 years, have been decorated and commended, been attacked and injured in the line of duty, and what Oathkeepers stands for is so obvious, so right, so “normal” to those of us that have lived a life of protecting the public and their rights that I’m of the opinion that we should just BE what we are, STAND TALL in our beliefs, apologize for NOTHING, and accept that there are going to be people that will object regardless. So what? We’re used to that. We deal with that every day. We can handle it. This is the ONE organization comprised of soldiers and police, veterans, and retired police, firefighters, and citizens that “get it”. Guts and commitment to to do what is right is not lacking nor should our motives for being members be questioned. I for one, could care less. I know what I’m going to do and I’m confident that the rest of the members will do the same. There’s no “defeat”, nor is there a “negative” interview that might affect the organization. You’re either in or you’re not. Those of us that are in are committed regardless because we know what we have to do and what is right. We really don’t need “spokespersons” to justify our existence, we don’t need “positive press”, and we don’t need affirmation from others (although it’s nice to hear occasionally.) We’re here to stay during these difficult and trying times. Nothing will deter us and we’ve seen so much, been through so much, experienced so much adversity, faced enemies far more lethal that we really don’t give a rat’s ass about the main stream media. Oathkeepers is here to stay, not because of interviews or speeches, but because of the premise upon which it is based and the fact there are many citizens that adhere to it.

  36. Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force.

  37. Chris Matthews just exposed himself for what he is and what he believes while commenting on the President’s address to the troops at West Point. He referred to the venue as “enemy territory!” Can you believe it? He considers the military, the people that protect him and his rights, the people who fight and die for his right to free speech and free living as “enemies”. It makes it extremely clear that our imaginations are not running wild, that we are not right wing nuts that are overreacting, and our suspicions have been confirmed ten-fold. Can you imagine an American citizen that worked for a past President, that has prospered in our free, democratic, and Capitalist society calling the military “the enemy”? Wow! From this point forward, Chris Matthews or his ilk will never be able to undermine this organization. He just validated why we exist in the first place.

  38. Cris Mathews is an Idiot and I don’t think there are to many that listen to him.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

If you wish to remain anonymous, use anonymous for name

© 2010 www.oathkeepers.org