Comments on: The Olofson Firearms Case: An Army Reservist and Innnocent Man, Imprisoned Because His Rifle Malfunctioned, is Denied Justice. Will You Be Next?

By: make free beats on the computer

make free beats on the computer — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:13:15 +0000

My persistent civil libertarianism will cause an ulcer if I keep reading stories like this.

By: Ryan Masters

Ryan Masters — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:57:54 +0000

Cremated?

You got a flamethrower???

By: FED-UP

FED-UP — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:21:12 +0000

Masters just likes wallowing in the status-quo.

Too bad for him (and all who rely on the nanny state to lead them) because their dying paradigm is about to be cremated.

By: Ryan Masters

Ryan Masters — Sat, 09 Jan 2010 18:45:27 +0000

Hey, just thought I’d check back in with you guys!

Obviously nothing’s changed. Same old shitburners.

The motto around here should be: “So much delusion to spread … so little time”

By: DeputyDawg

DeputyDawg — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:45:12 +0000

To 120.

FA weapons (and all other unlawfully regulated armaments) are only so expensive BECAUSE OF their unconstitutional regulation.

This is why the NRA are selling the Second Amendment OUT… To KEEP their members’ NFA “investments” collectible and highly sought after.

Besides, the gang-bangers of South Central already know how to modify their SAs into FAs anyway. NO NEED for an unlawful tax stamp or personal assessment by a corrupt bureaucrat.

IMO, the exercise of our Second Amendment at its finest. Sad, huh?

By: AKsarben

AKsarben — Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:55:57 +0000

It is absurd that he was even broght to trial. To prove intent the rifle should have been required to have the necessary parts that are on automatic weapon, and they are specific to timing.

The lawmakers need to do away with the unconstitutional law of select fire ownership anyway. Those who have the money are not going to buy expensive armament just to rob the local 7/11 store. Those that do, won’t use automatic weaons either as they are not very handy, or concealable, nor cheap.

The Second Amendment says ” … shall not be infringed.” Why is that so hard to follow? Why can they just keep violent felons in prison and let the law abiding peace keepers, alone? The BATFE needs to be relieved of certain duties, such as Firearms, which are protected by the Second Amendment.

By: Publius

Publius — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:39:13 +0000

110: I see that you, too, have discovered the secret of reasoning powerfully. You are 100% correct. The premise(s), once accepted as true, the only other requirement is that the formalities be properly observed. Cogency, of course, does not predicate truth, but most people are too ignorant to know that, so they accept all manner of falsehood as apodictic truth. I took logic as an engineering requirement at USC back in the stone age. It was a bit dry, but very revealing at the same time. The depth of the general ignorace of people is truly astonishing, not to mention frightening.

By: Publius

Publius — Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:05:04 +0000

This affair is so disgusting that the words I have for it would not be fit to print.

I would love to know who the candy-ass was that called the cops in the first place. Then I would love to have the name of the candy-ass cop who called BATF. They should be beaten so that on the day they lay on their deathbeds, angels circling overhead like vultures in wait, the very last thought before they plunge downward for the roast will be of the crime they committed against a good man as they weep bitter tears of shame and regret.

For pity’s sake, what have some of the people of this nation become? Squealers, informants, and busy-bodies. It is a disgrace of such proportions I simply cannot wrap my head around it.

All I can say is that Americans don’t seem to

Freedom is one of those things many people take for granted until it is gone. Once removed, bloodshed is likely the only thing that will restore it, and even then there are no guarantees. Is that what we want? The remedies are all before us, yet insufficient numbers of people seem interested in pursuing them. I don’t get it.

Anyhow, a good discussion of freedom can be found here: http://freedomisobvious.blogspot.com I recommend it for anyone even remotely interested in the concept because I have found that the vast and overwhelming majority of people do not possess a firm and proper understanding of it.

Best wishes to the Olofson family. I feel for him and his wife, but particularly for his children. How DARE anyone subject them to such injustice. The temerity is obscene.

By: DeputyDawg

DeputyDawg — Tue, 22 Dec 2009 04:44:56 +0000

The NFA and GCA both need to be repealed and the corrupted bureaucracies charged with enforcing them, abolished with extreme prejudice.

I can picture it now… a FREE America!

By: swager

swager — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:29:02 +0000

Have any of you watched the video from the jews for the preservation of firearms which shows in detail an incompetent tech branch guy shooting with different primered ammo till he gets his wanted result? He took a semi and “made” it fire a couple rounds and declared it a machinegun by definition with a broken firing pin. The tech branch will tape, wire, weight or otherwise “create” a new configuration to get the desired results. I gave my copy to a Senator a few years ago.There is a lot going on in this country than a lot of people know who are not into NFA.