June 3rd, 2009

COMPARE AND CONTRAST


THE OATH IN NAZI GERMANY:

I swear by God this Sacred oath:

That I shall render unconditional obedience to Adolf Hitler

Fuhrer of the German Reich and people,

Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces

And that I shall at all times be ready, as a brave soldier. To give my life for this oath …

The above is a clip from the recent film Valkyrie (an excellent movie. Highly recommended).

THE OATH IN AMERICA:

The American officer’s oath:

“I, _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.”

The American enlisted oath:

I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

In Nazi Germany, the oath was to Hitler and Hitler alone, and it was to obey unconditionally any order Hitler gave. Notice that not a word was said about the German constitution. This was because in Germany Hitler himself was the law and every order he gave was thus “lawful,” no matter how absurd or heinous.

In America, the oath is first and foremost to the Constitution, not to any man. Notice that the officer’s oath does not even mention the president.

And even though the enlisted oath includes a section about obeying the orders of the president and officers, that obedience is not unconditional. This is because our constitutional republic is supposed to be under the rule of law, not the rule of men, with the Constitution being the supreme law of the land, not the orders of the president. The orders of the president and of commissioned officers must be lawful, in accordance with the uniform code of military justice and the laws of the United States.

In America, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, not the mere words of any man, as it was in Nazi Germany.

See the difference?

Oath Keepers




Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps!


 Read More Posts

Comments posted belong to the commenter alone, and are not endorsed by Oath Keepers or the administrators for this site. We will remove offensive, racist, or threatening comments.

One Response to “COMPARE AND CONTRAST”

  1. 1
    Roger Says:

    Share39 Watada Discharged
    Saturday 26 September 2009

    by: Gregg K. Kakesako | The Honolulu Star-Bulletin

    Lt. Ehren Watada was the first commissioned military officer to refuse deployment to Iraq because he believed it was an illegal war. (Photo: PD-USGov-Military)
    The Army grants the officer’s resignation under “other than honorable conditions.”

    First Lt. Ehren Watada, the first commissioned military officer to refuse deployment to Iraq because he believed it was an illegal war, has won his three-year legal battle with the Army.

    With little fanfare the Army at Fort Lewis, Wash., accepted the resignation of the 1996 Kalani High School graduate, and he will be discharged the first week in October.

    Rather than seek a second court-martial against the artillery officer, the Army will grant Watada a discharge under “other than honorable conditions

Leave a Reply

© 2011 www.oathkeepers.org | Oath Keepers Corp Address: 5130 S. Fort Apache Rd - Las Vegas, NV 89148